This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced that a final rule will be published tomorrow, November 16, in the Federal Register implementing a designpatent practitioner bar. A request for comments (RFC) was also published in October 22.
Many brand owners are familiar with the value of registered trademarks, which safeguard the goodwill cultivated between mark holders and consumers by reducing confusion as to the source of the associated goods. By: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to the Federal Register that proposes a separate designpatent practitioner bar. Designpatent practitioners would only be able to participate in designpatent proceedings.
Thank you for reading the September 2023 issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to Market® newsletter. In this issue: - FTC Guidelines Influence How Influencers Influence - How DesignPatents Can Complement Brands' Trademark Portfolios. By: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) published its final rule, creating a separate designpatent bar where admitted designpatent practitioners will practice in designpatent proceedings only. (88 16, 2023).). 78644 (Nov. By: McDermott Will & Emery
by Dennis Crouch The United States Patent and Trademark Office has proposed a rule to create a separate designpatent practitioner bar. The USPTO is publishing this proposal in the Federal Register on May 16, 2023 (link below to the prepub).
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) recently reached an important milestone. On September 26, 2023, the USPTO issued its millionth designpatent. . By: Quarles & Brady LLP
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in designpatent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.
The US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) published a notice regarding supplemental guidance for PTO personnel examining designpatent claims containing computer-generated images. 80277 (Nov. By: McDermott Will & Emery
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its one millionth designpatent on September 26, 2023. D1,000,000 claims the ornamental design for a dispensing comb. This milestone comes during a particularly prolific period for designpatents.
Patent and Trademark Office published new guidance in the Federal Register on November 17, 2023, that clarifies the requirements for designpatents of computer-generated images, icons, and graphical user interfaces.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) recently reached an important milestone. On September 26, 2023, the USPTO issued its millionth designpatent. United States Patent D1,000,000 covers the ornamental design for a dispensing comb, as shown below. § 171).
by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running designpatent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Federal Circuit’s 2023 Decision. Columbia’s designpatent claims an “ornamental design of a heat reflective material” as shown in the figures. 3d 665 (Fed.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the law on comparison prior art in designpatent cases. DesignPatent No. D657,093 (“the D’093 Patent”) via sales of its products containing HeatWave™ liner material, as illustrated side-by-side below.
Oral arguments were held on Thursday, January 12, 2023, in Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. The parties faced off in a rematch at the Federal Circuit following an earlier bout involving the same designpatent, U.S. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. and Curver Luxembourg, SARL, v. Home Expressions Inc.
REGISTRATION NOW OPEN – 16 th Annual USPTO Design Day on May 4, 2023 Registration for the 16th Annual USPTO Design Day 2023 has been made available and interested parties can register virtually or in person here. The 16th annual Design Day will be held on May 4, 2023, from 10 a.m.-5
Save the Date to Attend the 16 th Annual USPTO Design Day The 2023 iteration of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s annual Design Day will be held on May 4, 2023, with options to attend either in-person at USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia or virtually.
on 22 February, 2023 (Delhi High Court) The dispute pertained to the use of “Sona” as a part of the mark and trade name “Sona Mandhira Pvt. on 24 February, 2023 (Delhi High Court) In the present case, the plaintiff alleged infringement of its device “Royal” and passing off by the defendant’s adoption of “Zabreen Royal” device.
How many patents have I obtained for clients? As of January 10, 2023, the total number of US patents I have obtained for clients is 695. Number of US Patents by Patent Attorney Vic Lin. That total includes both utility and designpatents in the US. They can still practice trademark or copyright law.
On June 5, 2023, Judge Engelmayer (S.D.N.Y.) Patent & Trademark Office cancelled the asserted patent—U.S. DesignPatent No. dismissed Plaintiffs' infringement claims against Defendants. After the U.S.
.” The article was authored by the AIPLA’s Augmented Reality(AR) / Virtual Reality(VR) subcommittee, which I had the honor of co-leading with Barrett Spraggins in 2022 (and continue to co-lead in 2023). The authors include Barrett Spraggins, David Pointer, George Raynal, and Ryan Phelan.
Readers may recall that in May 2023, Niyati posted on the official announcement to hold “Open House Sessions” on weekdays from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, to “address grievances/suggestions on issues related to Intellectual Property Rights.” He shares a keen interest in Patent related issues and wishes to discover more in the field of IP.
2023) The Timberland Boot trade dress case is pending before the Fourth Circuit, raising some interesting questions about the role of product trade dress vs designpatents vs copyright vs utility patents. Timberland boots were first sold in the 1970s with a unique design that quickly resonated with consumers.
88737597 (September 12, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. As to the first factor, there were no pertinent utility patents of record, but there was a designpatent owned by the applicant. Welch 2023. In re Buff and Shine Manufacturing, Inc. Wellington). Read comments and post your comment here.
90730679 (June 22, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. Finally, Pen Pal pointed to its four designpatents as presumptive proof that the proposed mark is not de jure functional. it is de facto functional) doesn't mean that it's functional in a trademark sense ( de jure functional). Welch 2023.
Applying the Morton-Norwich factors, and giving some weight to applicant's designpatents, the Board concluded that the USPTO failed to make a prima facie case of functionality. 88941388 (May 22, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. indicates that the design is not de jure functional.'" Welch 2023.
Other Posts Honesty as a Defense vis-à-vis Trademark Infringements: Principle or Provision? Can “honest concurrent use” be used as a defense against a trademark infringement claim? Lokesh, highlighting its history, argues that honest concurrent use is a principle of trademark law and is not limited to a provision.
Quarles & Brady partner and editor-in-chief of the firm’s Protecting the Product design rights blog, James Aquilina, and patent engineer Harrison Powell attended the 16 th Annual USPTO Design Day on May 4, 2023, in Alexandria, Virginia at the USPTO’s Headquarters. GM Global Technology Operations LLC.
Canada remains an important jurisdiction in North America for IP filings and is further reinforced by rapid population growth, surpassing the 40 million mark in 2023. Significant CIPO Fee Increase Effective January 1, 2024, a one-time 25% fee increase will be implemented, impacting most patent, industrial design, trademark and copyright fees.
90730679 (June 22, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. Finally, Pen Pal pointed to its four designpatents as presumptive proof that the proposed mark is not de jure functional. it is de facto functional) doesn't mean that it's functional in a trademark sense ( de jure functional). Welch 2023.
Amazon sellers must understand the major forms of intellectual property –patents, trademarks, and copyrights–and the common pitfalls associated with each form to avoid infringement allegations, storefront disruptions or closures, and even lawsuits. Registering trademarks with the U.S.
On October 18, 2022, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) posted two notices on Regulations.gov seeking public input on the requirements to practice before the USPTO and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Request 3 : Possible Creation of a Separate DesignPatent Practitioner Bar. ” [1].
In its complaint, Skull Shaver claimed that Ideavillage’s leg shaver infringed its designpatent on a head shaver. The patent-in-suit is U.S. D693,060 (“the D’060 patent”) for an electric head shaver, and the accused product is a Flawless Legs Shaver, which is itself covered by U.S. 5-7 below).
Highlights of the Week Deadline to File Comments/ Suggestions on IP Manuals Extended till November 15, 2023 Image by Freepik The CGPDTM has extended the deadline to file comments/ suggestions on IP Manuals and Guidelines to November 15. Chancery Pavilion v. In their co-authored post, Sidhi, Praharsh and Swaraj write on this order.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping Intellectual Property rights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). Chapter 2, authored by David Musker, considers the overlaps between patents and designs.
As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. A special thanks to Mr. G. Nataraj, Ms.
On September 7, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs published the Draft Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns 2023, inviting comments from the public. This can lead to trademark infringement, as it involves using another entity’s intellectual property to deceive users.
on 12 January, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Division bench of Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interim injunction order by the Single judge bench. DB order) to reiterate that one registered proprietor of a trademark can sue another registered proprietor of a trademark alleging deceptive similarity between the competing marks (para.
The Board upheld two refusals to register the product configuration shown below as a trademark for "Food service equipment levelers of metal," finding the proposed mark to be de jure functional under Section 2(e)(5), and, alternatively, lacking in acquired distinctiveness. but utility patent evidence overcame that presumption.
This is a designpatent SAD Scheme case before Judge Jeremy C. He’s a Biden appointee from 2023). GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll The post Will Judges Become More Skeptical of Joinder in SAD Scheme Cases?–Dongguan [Like many of you, I am still trying to make sense of the election results. Emoji GmbH v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content