Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

2023-6 on August 30, 2023, calling for comments from interested parties addressing dozens of questions. The Office received roughly 10,000 comments on October 30, 2023. The copyright law implications of AI training are currently being litigated in several different federal copyright infringement actions. 8] See U.S.

Copyright 96

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 96

LexBlog IP

MAY 18, 2023

Litigation ensued, in which AWF advanced fair use as its defense. Today (May 18, 2023) the United States Supreme Court rejected AWF’s fair use defense, finding in Goldsmith’s favor. Underlying the Court’s decision is the copyright owner’s exclusive right to prepare derivative works.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Copyright 52

IP Tech Blog

AUGUST 4, 2023

21-869, as part of INDICAM ’s podcast series “IPxSUMMER 2023 around the world”. The Idea of copyright is actually a bundle of different rights… one of the copyright rights is the right to prepare derivate works (e.g., It’s a way where you take your original work and add new expression to it. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 12, 2023

From the output side, the relevant issues are whether the output is copyright-protected, and whether it infringes the copyright of ‘works “ingested” during the training stage of the AI system’ ( see Quintais, here ; see also here and here ). To facilitate the process of TDM, data is the key.

Copyright 81

Copyright Derivative Work Music Design 81

Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

A lot of ink has been spilled ( mine included, if you need a refresher ) on litigation that ultimately boiled down to whether it was fair use for AWF to license the right to publish Warhol’s artwork based on Goldsmith’s Prince photo. " — Robert Indiana, artist [link] — Aaron Moss (@copyrightlately) May 19, 2023 2.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 98

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 9, 2024

She graduated from National Law University, Delhi in 2023 & enjoys reading and writing on copyright laws. The NEL was held to be a derivative work, and the Archive’s lending practices violative of copyright law. Internet Archive, our fellowship applicant Tanishka Goswami explains the implication of the decision on fair use.

Copyright Law 105

Copyright Law Copyright Fair Use Law 105

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

598 U.S. _ (2023) (Citations are to the Slip Opinion (“Slip Op.”)). ” The SDNY litigation focused on whether Warhol had “transformed” Goldsmith’s photograph. Such pro­tection includes the right to prepare derivative works that transform the original.” Goldsmith et al. ,

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 19, 2023

Finally, an AI model trained on synthetic data may still generate outputs that are potentially infringing on copyright-protected works depending on the similarity of such outputs to those original works. 18, 2023), available at Thaler v. of Columbia 2023 – Google Scholar. Perlmutter , No. 22-1564 (D.D.C.

IP 52

IP Derivative Work Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

Does such an output infringe on a copyrighted work of a third party, especially those works “ingested” during the training stage of the AI system? Under US law, is the output a “ derivative work ” of the “ingested” copyrighted works? 3] Credit for the prompt goes to Professor Thomas Margoni.

Copyright 138

Copyright Copyright Law Fair Use Law 138

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 7, 2023

Ginsburg’s lecture took place on 3 May 2023. is non-alienable and, therefore, is still very beneficial to authors, despite its evident shortcomings (such as the exclusion of “works for hire” and derivative works, as well as the requirement of notice from the author to effect the termination rights). As an example, Prof.

Contracts 52

Contracts Derivative Work Intellectual Property Music 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 1, 2023

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Recently, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed what has become known as the “server test”: in order to be held directly liable for violating the public display right, the alleged infringer must have a fixed “copy” of the work stored on a server in its possession or control. Instagram, LLC , 2023 WL 4554649 (9th Cir.

Blogging 98

Blogging Copying Social Media Copyright 98

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 23, 2023

.” From ongoing debates about the human element (or requirement) of authorship to debates over what constitutes a transformative work to the gauntlet laid down in footnote 2 of Justice Kagan’s dissent in the Supreme Court’s May 18, 2023 decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc., Google] , 804 F.3d

Copyright 52

Copyright Art Copying Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

Although this case has yet to reach a resolution, it draws attention to the potential for litigation surrounding the copyright rights required to mint NFTs. According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] Mason Rothschild.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Brands 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

The question then arises as to whether the fiction writer alone owns the copyright to work drawn in whole or part from another’s writings or experience. . ‘The Covenant of Water’ is a rich, heartfelt novel. That question recently arose in Sonya Larson v. ” Let’s see why.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 10, 2024

On December 6, 2023, Bob Woodward and other defendants moved to dismiss claims brought against them by former President Donald J. Before the second amendment, President Trump received a copyright registration covering the work, despite an early registration being recorded in Woodward’s favor. What did those papers say?

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Government Intellectual Property 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

If not, the court may have to address several other interesting, rarely-litigated issues concerning the proper scope of copyright in recorded interviews. Based solely on the complaint that was filed, there are six major issues raised by the case: First, were the recorded interviews a copyright-eligible “work of authorship”?

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131