article thumbnail

Copyright Catfight?

BYU Copyright Blog

The University disputed that Boyages owns all copyright in and has exclusive rights over the contested work. It is important to note that Boyages claimed that her logo was original and not a derivative work. They also admitted displaying the logo as described by Boyages but did not believe such use was unlawful.

article thumbnail

Checklist of Issues on Generative IP

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay The intersection of Artificial intelligence and Intellectual Property is complex. EU (CDSM arts 3-4; obligation concerning sufficiently detailed summary in June 2023 draft of AI Act) d. Does the machine infringe when it produces a new “work”? Impact of Warhol, esp for GenAI) b.

IP 113
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Copyright Office Rejects Another Bid to Register Artwork “Co-Authored” by AI

LexBlog IP

On December 11, 2023, the Copyright Review Board affirmed the Copyright Office’s decision to reject Ankit Sahni’s application to register the AI-generated work depicted above. The Copyright Office opined that the work was a classic example of a derivative work in that it was a digitalization of a photograph.

Artwork 52
article thumbnail

U.S. Copyright Guidelines for Works Containing AI-Generated Material

LexBlog IP

The growing use of AI in various creative fields has necessitated a clear legal framework to protect intellectual property rights. The guidelines offer clarification on copyright eligibility, authorship requirements, and the registration process for works that incorporate AI-generated material.

article thumbnail

Significant Roadblocks for Plaintiffs in Generative Artificial Intelligence Lawsuit: California Judge Dismisses Most Claims Against AI Developers in Andersen v. Stability AI

LexBlog IP

On October 30, 2023, U.S. vi] Plaintiffs’ claims that AI outputs are “derivative works” failed in part for lack of substantial similarity to third-party copyrighted content. ” [viii] Skepticism that the AI model itself could be a “derivative work.” Stability AI Ltd. [vi]

article thumbnail

Use of Warhol’s Prince Image Found Not to Be Sufficiently Transformative for Fair Use 

LexBlog IP

On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fair use. Applying a new lens on how to view the purpose of a derivative work under U.S. copyright law.

article thumbnail

Podcast: SPB’s Joe Grasser Covers Art Appropriation with INDICAM

LexBlog IP

21-869, as part of INDICAM ’s podcast series “IPxSUMMER 2023 around the world” As many will recall, SCOTUS recently upheld a ruling that an early 1980s Andy Warhol’s photograph of the artist Prince was not fair use. one of the copyright rights is the right to prepare derivate works (e.g.,

Art 52