LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2023

Transformative use” is not mentioned in Section 107 of the Copyright Act but has been read into the first of four fair use factors. If you are confused by the difference between transformation that excuses infringement and transformation that is the exclusive right of the creator, welcome to my world.

Litigation 98

Litigation Fair Use Copying Derivative Work 98

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

The Copyright Act motivates creativity by granting the author of an original creative work rights to reproduce their work, prepare derivatives works, and (in the case of pictorial or graphic works) display the copyrighted works publicly. 4] “The larger the difference, the more likely the.

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

A detailed analysis of Goldsmith , however, yields little comfort to content owners when assessing the applicability of fair use to non-expressive uses of copyrightable content for use in AI learning models. 1258, (2023). See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith , 598 S.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 105

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

billion in the first quarter of 2023 , largely driven by successful releases from Morgan Wallen, Taylor Swift, and the aforementioned Drake. First of all, in terms of copyright, to reiterate our very clearly articulated position. That is, in fact, the very nature of sound recording copyright and ownership.”

Music 84

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 84

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

The question then arises as to whether the fiction writer alone owns the copyright to work drawn in whole or part from another’s writings or experience. Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 31, 2023

Goldsmith in a 7-2 decision issued May 18, 2023, authored by Justice Sotomayor. The Court held that the first factor of the copyright fair use test favored respondent photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, rather than petitioner, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (“AWF”). Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Copyright Editing 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

A detailed analysis of Goldsmith , however, yields little comfort to content owners when assessing the applicability of fair use to non-expressive uses of copyrightable content for use in AI learning models. 1258, (2023). See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith , 598 S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

Copyright Office published a Notice of inquiry (“NOI”) and request for comments, Artificial Intelligence and Copyright, Docket No. 2023-6 on August 30, 2023, calling for comments from interested parties addressing dozens of questions. The Office received roughly 10,000 comments on October 30, 2023.

Copyright 95

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 95

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 24, 2024

Our pilot empirical work in January-March 2023 mapped ToS across a representative sample of 13 generative AI providers, drawn from across the globe and including small providers as well as the large globally well-known firms such as Google and OpenAI. If output works infringe copyright, who is responsible (e.g.

Copyright 128

Copyright Ownership Social Media Licensing 128

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith , 598 U.S. _ (2023). [2] 2] Slip op. 3] Slip op.

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 130

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

A detailed analysis of Goldsmith , however, yields little comfort to content owners when assessing the applicability of fair use to non-expressive uses of copyrightable content for use in AI learning models. 1258, (2023). See Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith , 598 S.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 40

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

21-869 (May 18, 2023). As usual, readers who are already familiar with the case and/or with copyright law may skip the “Background” sections below (but don’t skip the commentary “The Road Not Taken”). For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.

Fair Use 96

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 96

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

598 U.S. _ (2023) (Citations are to the Slip Opinion (“Slip Op.”)). Money and copyright won by a 7-2 majority. Goldsmith notified AWF of her belief that the work infringed her copyright. Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement. (Or in this case, Orange.) Goldsmith et al. ,

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 1, 2023

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Recently, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed what has become known as the “server test”: in order to be held directly liable for violating the public display right, the alleged infringer must have a fixed “copy” of the work stored on a server in its possession or control. July 17, 2023). 882 (2006).

Blogging 96

Blogging Copying Social Media Copyright 96

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 16, 2023

Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts 1) Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act by João Pedro Quintais “ Generative AI is one of the hot topics in copyright law today. ” 3) How to Distinguish Transformative Fair Uses From Infringing Derivative Works? by Pamela Samuelson “In March 2022 the U.S.

Blogging 52

Blogging Law IP Fair Use 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith , 598 U.S. _ (2023). [2] 2] Slip op.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.’s ’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith , 598 U.S. _ (2023). [2] 2] Slip op.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law ]. years after the initial injunction, the SB proceeded to vacate this interim injunction on October 17 2023 , and also undertook a detailed discussion on the question of copyrightability of GUIs. Tejaswini is a 3rd-year B.A.

Copyright 59

Copyright Marketing Marketing Copying 59

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 26, 2023

Plaintiffs hit back, noting that OpenAI hasn’t moved to dismiss the “core claim” in the lawsuits—direct infringement by OpenAI—and arguing that “substantial similarity” is irrelevant because OpenAI copied their works wholesale, without permission, in order to make ChatGPT work.

Copying 52

Copying Derivative Work Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

GitHub in the Context of Other Generative AI Lawsuits and the Implications for the Future of Generative AI This suit against GitHub’s Copilot is just one of many copyright-related lawsuits brought against makers of different generative AI systems. Stability AI Ltd. et al , No. Stability AI Ltd. et al , No. Stability AI, Inc. ,

Licensing 52

Licensing Copyright Notice Copyright Privacy 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 3, 2023

Originality is the quality that distinguishes produced or invented works from copies, clones, forgeries, or derivative works by being new or novel. University Tutorial Press was sued by the plaintiff, University of London Press, for copyright infringement. It was written with a distinct style and message.

Copyright 91

Copyright Public Domain Copying Publishing 91

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 23, 2023

.” From ongoing debates about the human element (or requirement) of authorship to debates over what constitutes a transformative work to the gauntlet laid down in footnote 2 of Justice Kagan’s dissent in the Supreme Court’s May 18, 2023 decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc., ” Id.

Copyright 52

Copyright Art Copying Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

Although none has reached a resolution, these private civil actions highlight various legal theories of liability that could arise when participating in the NFT market, including claims for copyright infringement, trademark infringement, breach of contract and violations of securities laws. Damon Dash. Roc-A-Fella Records Inc.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52

SpicyIP

AUGUST 18, 2024

However, owing to the volatile regulatory environment in India, the plaintiff blocked its services in India from 2023 onwards. Other IP Developments Lacoste wins 23 old trademark infringement case. Kimdotcom to be deported to to US to face trial in copyright infringement case.

Registering Trademarks 82

Registering Trademarks Trademark Cease and Desist Copyright 82

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 2, 2023

SpicyIP Tidbit: GII 2023 – India Retains its 40th Rank India ranks 40th in the Global Innovation Index, 2023! on 21 September, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Image from here The plaintiff alleged infringement of its suit patents in parts of combined harvester by the defendants. Case Summaries Kubota Corporation v. Defendant no.

Licensing 59

Licensing Trademark Intellectual Property IP 59