2023 Cease and Desist Copyright Fair Use 
Dear Rich IP Blog
SEPTEMBER 26, 2023
Dear Rich: Does putting "Copyright 2023" at the bottom of page pages protect it from site visitors who download an image or narrative content? Placing a copyright notice on your website is like sticking a "Keep off the grass" sign on your front lawn. Ensure you own or have permission to use your website content.
IP Tech Blog
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
18, 2023) , the plaintiff brought a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement because a photograph flashed on the screen during the “Tiger King 2” documentary depicted a tattoo of the now famous “Tiger King” (a/k/a “Joe Exotic”), that the plaintiff tattoo artist had inked. 1258 (2023) weighed in favor of Netflix. In Cramer v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 13, 2023
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 16, 2023
Copyright owners are in the best position to spot and redress infringement, so they should identify alleged infringement to services and seek intervention when they see infringements. This paradigm, however, breaks down when copyright ownership is contested. 2023 WL 5211628 (N.D. 2023 WL 4157446 (C.D. June 27, 2023).
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
NOVEMBER 30, 2023
Allegedly on behalf of Barrett, an SEO vendor sent DMCA takedown notices to Google, alleging that Source Capital had copied some of Barrett’s copyrighted material. Source Capital alleges that no copyright violation took place at all. Barrett Financial Group, LLC , 2023 WL 7552330 (D. Adolly.com, 2023 WL 5672170 (D.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
APRIL 29, 2023
Of the efficacious four, three were based exclusively on trademark rights, not copyright. The court says those aren’t DMCA takedown notices by definition, because they didn’t assert any copyright interests; so they are outside 512(f)’s scope. Because the other 21 didn’t have any effect, the court ignores those.
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
18, 2023) , the plaintiff brought a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement because a photograph flashed on the screen during the “Tiger King 2” documentary depicted a tattoo of the now famous “Tiger King” (a/k/a “Joe Exotic”), that the plaintiff tattoo artist had inked. In Cramer v. Netflix, Inc. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content