This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In 2022 and looking ahead to 2023, there is one story that is dominating the narrative of both copyright and plagiarism matters: Artificial Intelligence. 2022 was a breakout year for artificial intelligence in creative fields, and 2023 will likely be one too. However, that is not true this year. Copyright and AI. Plagiarism and AI.
The US Copyright Office (CO) Review Board rejected a request to register artwork partially generated by artificial intelligence (AI) because the work contains more than a de minimis amount of content generated by AI and the applicant was unwilling to disclaim the AI-generated material. 5, 2023) (S.
On September 5, 2023, the U.S. Copyright Office Review Board affirmed the Copyright Office’s refusal to register a digital artwork created with the Midjourney text-to-image GenAI tool.
Jason Allen, the author of the two-dimensional digital artwork, titled “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” which was rejected by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado asking the court to find that his work is eligible for copyright registration. The Review Board of the U.S.
On 21 February 2023, the US Copyright Office (USCO) issued a decision further to a request to register Zarya of the Dawn , a graphic novel that includes images created with the assistance of Midjourney , a generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) system. The case In September 2022, Ms.
Jason Allen, the author of the two-dimensional digital artwork, titled “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial,” which was rejected by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado asking the court to find that his work is eligible for copyright registration. The Review Board of the U.S.
2023, Generative AI Works Found Ineligible for Copyright Under the U.S. Copyright Office denied copyright protection for Kashtanova’s Midjourney-generated artwork, the Office found their work lacked the critical component of a human author. Ehrich Bros.’s s advertisement for hats, copying Sarony’s Oscar Wilde No. When the U.S.
This Africa IP Highlights 2023 is the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Interested readers can find the Africa IP Highlights 2022, here. Today, we begin with developments in the copyright field.
As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. pending or issued registrations) and those that are not. Intellectual property is a company asset, just like inventory.
As the well-known Sanremo Music Festival is approaching with the 2023 edition, the Italian Supreme Court recently issued decision No. 1107/2023 involving RAI - Radiotelevisione Italiana. The Supreme Court recalled the conditions of protectability of an artwork in a case involving a work created using software.
And the number of active trademark registrations in the USPTO database is larger than ever. Additionally, since late December 2021, when new procedures went into effect, the USPTO has received around 100 expungement petitions and about 100 re-examination petitions to get rid of registrations for marks that are allegedly not in use.
Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Allen did not agree to the request and continued to request copyright registration of the entire work. Last year, Jason M.
The deadline to respond is 18 October 2023. The USCO underlined again the importance of the “ human authorship ” requirement and stated that applicants must bear the duty to disclose the inclusion of AI-generated content in a work submitted for registration and to provide a brief explanation of the human author’s contribution to the work.
While we wait for further guidance on the registrability of the art output by generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, the U.S. 11, 2023, the Copyright Office's Review Board rejected an artist's attempt to register his "2-D artwork" – now the fourth…. By: Holland & Knight LLP
On December 11, 2023, the Copyright Review Board affirmed the Copyright Office’s decision to reject Ankit Sahni’s application to register the AI-generated work depicted above. In effect, Sanhi was attempting to register the artwork as a derivative of his photograph. 16, 2023) (quoting U.S. The answer is ‘yes.’”)
AI and Copyright: More Developments – Human Prompts are Not ‘Direct Instructions’ After the Thaler case, the US Copyright Office passed another interesting order on AI-generated works, this time refusing the registration due to the work’s failure to meet the de-minimis threshold. Shatrughan Kumar AKA Khesari Lal Yadav and Ors.
Copyright Office’s AI Initiative launched in early 2023. Among other things, the Initiative’s portal compiles registration decisions for AI-generated materials. Particularly instructive is a December 11, 2023 decision by the Copyright Review Board affirming the denial of registration to an AI-generated artwork.
On September 5, 2023, as explained here , the US Copyright Office (USCO) issued an interesting decision in a copyright registration matter that involved AI-generated work. Unlike the Thaler case, artist Jason Allen had applied for copyright registration of an AI-generated work ( Théâtre D’opéra Spatial ) naming himself as the author.
If a new user re-registers a name whose registration is expired, a new token is created. However, and beyond the fact that the registration is expired, any name maintains in the blockchain its own history. McCoy’s registration on the Namecoin blockchain expired In January 2015.
On August 18, 2023, the US District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed the U.S. In 2019, Stephen Thaler submitted a copyright application for his visual artwork, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” which stated that an AI computer algorithm, the “Creativity Machine,” created the artistic piece. Perlmutter, et.
In addition to patents and trademarks, copyright registrations can be valuable in protecting certain products. Copyright registrations, therefore, may help to protect the 2-dimensional artwork of a design, the 3-dimensional shape of a product or a combination of both. In re Seminole Tribe of Florida , 2023 U.S.P.Q.2d
Copyright Office originally granted copyright registration to a comic book titled “Zarya of the Dawn.” copyright office for registration. Kashtanova had previously applied for and obtained an original copyright registration for the Work, Registration # VAu001480196. PatentNext Takeaway: The U.S.
Copyright Office’s AI Initiative launched in early 2023. Among other things, the Initiative’s portal compiles registration decisions for AI-generated materials. Particularly instructive is a December 11, 2023 decision by the Copyright Review Board affirming the denial of registration to an AI-generated artwork.
Copyright Office already requires copyright registrants to disclose if content submitted for registration includes unclaimable AI-generated material. A simple statement of disclaimer must be included in the registration application. Authors must specifically disclaim any AI-generated parts during registration. 349 (1884).
As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. pending or issued registrations) and those that are not. Intellectual property is a company asset, just like inventory.
This AI system — the so-called “Creativity Machine” — produced the artwork titled “ A Recent Entrance to Paradise ”. Conversely, if the Register denies an application for registration for lack of copyrightable subject matter, then this means that the work at issue was never copyright protectable. H&M Hennes & Mauritz ).
In addition, concerns have been raised regarding the authenticity and possession of the artwork, the involvement of the artist, and the authorship and ownership of its copyright in relation to the integration of artificial intelligence into the artistic process. Two major obstacles can be recognized in this context.
The primary challenge arising from AI-generated artwork pertains to copyright existence and ownership. Case Summary The plaintiff, Stephen Thaler, used the “Creativity Machine,” a generative AI technology, to generate a piece of artwork. However, in the case of AI, determining authorship becomes complex.
courts are addressing lawsuits brought by artists alleging that AI-generated art infringes on copyrights held by the artists for their artwork. Plaintiffs asserted that the defendants’ conduct resulted in, among other things, copyright infringement of the plaintiffs’ artwork. Several U.S.
90976324 (May 5, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). However, when the evidence is insufficient to show that a proposed mark has been widely used in connection with the goods at issue, it is improper to refuse registration on the ground of failure-to-function. Welch 2023. How do you think this came out?
90641690 (November 21, 2023) [precedentia] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). A threshold question in evaluating the registrability of a trademark or service mark is whether the proposed mark meets the source indication requirement. 1578, 2023 USPQ2d 677, at *5 (2023) (cleaned up). Welch 2023. Jack Daniel’s Props.,
Upcoming Conferences The "CITMA Autumn Conference" will take place on 19 October 2023 at the Library of Birmingham, UK. Registration closes on 6 October 2023. The conference is free, but registration is required, which closes on 25 September 2023. More details, here. Spaces are limited, so register soon.
2023 has been a watershed year for AI with its entry into the broader public consciousness. For those interested, written comments are due by October 18, 2023. AI has been front and center in the legal space as well, as this blog has detailed here and here. Now, the U.S. We will track further developments in this space.
Copyright Guidelines for Works Containing AI-Generated Material by Aaron Rice Introduction The United States Copyright Office published comprehensive guidelines addressing the registration process for works containing material generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Authorship and Human Contribution A. Identifying AI-Generated Material A.
Ankit Sahni’s AI “Co-authored” Artwork Denied Registration by US, Continues to be Registered in India Can AI (co)author art? vs Controller Of Patents on 8 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Emerson’s appeals under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, contest the rejection of patent applications (Nos. M/S Loreal S.A
Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M.
Copyright Office refused registration on the basis that the work lacked the required human authorship. Using this system, he autonomously generated a 2-D artwork titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise.” ” In August 2023, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Copyright Office. .”
Copyright also protects the original work of the inventors, such as the software code, literary work, music, and artwork. Protection without Registration : Different from patent and trademark, trade secrets don’t require to be registered, allowing startups to protect valuable information without disclosing it openly. References.
The plaintiff had acquired numerous registrations in India for the MARRIOTT and MARRIOTT formative marks. In 2023, the plaintiff came across a hotel based in Mumbai, India under the trade name HOTEL PRIME MARRIOT with the exact spelling of ‘MARRIOTT’ as used by the plaintiff in its brand. Goenka, founder of the RPG Group.
2023 has been a watershed year for AI with its entry into the broader public consciousness. For those interested, written comments are due by October 18, 2023. AI has been front and center in the legal space as well, as this blog has detailed here and here. Now, the U.S. We will track further developments in this space.
22-cv-384 (JSR), 2023 U.S. 2, 2023) (citation omitted).) Ownership of trademark rights is not contingent on a registration. In the United States, trademark rights are acquired through exclusive, continuous use, not registration. ” ( Hermès Int’l v. Rothschild , No. LEXIS 17669, at *11 (S.D.N.Y.
The District Court Decision On August 18, 2023, invoking its jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedures Act to review a final agency action, Judge Beryl A. The court then states plainly: “The [Copyright] Register did not err in denying the copyright registration application presented by plaintiff. 18, 2023)
The United States Copyright Office has clarified the requirement for human authorship in generative AI through various decisions that rejected copyright registration for AI-generated works, each varying in human involvement. Despite this, the Office denied copyright registration for the AI-generated images.
On August 18, 2023, the US District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed the U.S. In 2019, Stephen Thaler submitted a copyright application for his visual artwork, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” which stated that an AI computer algorithm, the “Creativity Machine,” created the artistic piece.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content