Remove 2023 Remove Advertising Remove Brands Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

Lei, 2023 WL 6373073, No. 21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. In December 2020, Deetsch notified Amazon of his patents through the Brand Registry portal and asked Amazon to remove the Lei defendants’ products. 22-cv-1166-RSH-BLM (S.D.

article thumbnail

Africa IP highlights 2023: Trade marks

The IPKat

Yesterday, it was all about key developments in the copyright field in the Africa IP Highlights 2023 – the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Today, it’s about the trade marks. Katpost on the decision here.

IP 81
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Webinar Recap: Trademark Lessons Learned in 2023

LexBlog IP

We presented a webinar last week entitled How to Win Your Next Trademark Battle: Lessons Learned in 2023 to give brand owners and their lawyers an overview of key takeaways from last year’s trademark cases. If you missed our live presentation, you can view a recording here. They may also consider the possibility of non-U.S.

article thumbnail

TTAB Posts August 2023 Hearing Schedule

The TTABlog

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled nine oral hearings for the month of August 2023. August 3, 2023 - 11 AM: TF Intellectual Property Pty Ltd v. August 3, 2023 - 1 PM: Mealpass, Inc. August 8, 2023 - 11 AM: In re Molina Healthcare, Inc. August 9, 2023 - 11 AM: Billy Stott v.

article thumbnail

Be Bold but Never Break the Trademark Mold:Implications of Delhi HC’s Decision in PepsiCo v. Parle Agro

IP and Legal Filings

The decision of the Delhi HC, pronounced on 18 th September 2023, penned by Hon’ble Justice C Hari Shankar, in this matter over the tagline “For the Bold” has caused ripples in the field of Intellectual Property Rights. , it filed for a trademark infringement and unfair advantage suit in the court against Parle Agro. For the Bold!”

article thumbnail

2023: The Year of the Burgers

LexBlog IP

From the Big Mac v Big Jack to the KFC v HFC – 2023 was the year of the burger. Further, considering the information before the Court, Justice Burley agreed with Hungry Jack’s in that ‘cheekiness’ was part of its brand and that they had no intention to confuse consumers.

article thumbnail

Can A Single Colour Mark Acquire Registration In India?

IP and Legal Filings

2] However, the quintessential reason for such distinction is due to a slightly elevated standard for the registration of non-traditional marks. Image Source : Shutterstock] The Trademarks Act, 1999 (‘Act’) refers exclusively to the registrability of ‘combination of colours’. [3] In this also falls the case of colour marks.