Remove 2022 Remove Fair Use Remove Marketing Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

My “Summer” 2022 Activities

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

That’s a long prelude to explaining how my “summer 2022” really dates back to November 2021 and won’t end until January. Nevertheless, as the semester has already started at Santa Clara Law, I’ll do my rundown of my 2022 outputs-to-date anyway. Regulation of Political Advertising (2022 Edition).

Editing 91
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I’m pleased to announce the 2022 edition (13th edition) of my Internet Law casebook, Internet Law: Cases & Materials. For what it’s worth, this year I’ll teach the course in Spring 2023 instead of Fall 2022). I posted the 2022 version, so it’s as fresh as it gets. Note About Fair Use.

Editing 141
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Announcing the 2024 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

That case will surely be appealed, so I remain in the market for a good TTC principal case. I posted the 2022 version. Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. Bright Data on the TTC issue. Bright Data V. CSC (2d Cir.) MGM Studios v.

Editing 101
article thumbnail

Twitter Can’t Quash a 512(h) Subpoena

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court says that instead of doing a First Amendment analysis, it’s possible that a fair use analysis is sufficient for 512(h) subpoenas (citing Eldred for the principle that fair use is the First Amendment safety valve to copyright infringement). Wishing you and your family have a wonderful 2022.].

Fair Use 113
article thumbnail

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2022, in ML Genius v. While this conflict might seem minor (X’s users, after all, are not in the business of granting scraping licenses), the next one was not: Fair use. Judge Alsup suggested that X’s ToS conflict with copyright law by prohibiting scraping irrespective of whether it qualifies as fair use.

Blogging 127
article thumbnail

Court Quashes 512(h) Subpoena on First Amendment Grounds–In re 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” Second, Bayside said that copyright already accommodates First Amendment considerations via the fair use defense (citing the Reddit case ). Nature of the use. The photos were already published, which weighs in favor of fair use. ” This also weighs in favor of fair use (?). Market effect.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

It could also undercut the commercial market for books and works already created; this is because, on demand, the Products are able not only to summarize books in detail, chapter by chapter, but also to regenerate the text of books (§ I.B.110-111). 2000) (“ copying an entire work militates against a finding of fair use. ”).

Fair Use 132