Remove 2022 Remove Designs Remove False Advertising Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

dissatisfaction w/Amazon's partner program isn't TM infringement/false advertising

43(B)log

2022 WL 670919, NO. 7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” Similar searches were also “frustrating”; Melwani alleged that the search results were “erroneous, scattershot, mingled” as well as “consistently confusing, misleading, false, and deceptive.” Amazon.com, Inc., So too here.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. Troia claimed that he did not use the LoanStreet trademark in commerce. Just referencing a trademark on the Internet does not support a trademark claim, full stop. Troia , 2022 WL 3544170 (S.D.N.Y.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

facially plausible false advertising claim can be added to TM complaint

43(B)log

27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and false designation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a false advertising claim. Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No.

article thumbnail

4th Circuit upholds contempt ruling in false advertising case: scrub your website and FB account!

43(B)log

4th -, 2022 WL 2036293, No. 7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying false advertising claim. Also, there was no relevant difference between trademark and false advertising cases in terms of accepting informational harm. De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 20-1846, No.

article thumbnail

Google's "order delivery/takeout" results aren't misleading/TM infringement

43(B)log

Google LLC, 2022 WL 17072948, No. 18, 2022) Short opinion, summarized by the opening paragraph: The plaintiffs in this case don’t like how Google facilitates online orders from their restaurants. They try to articulate claims for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false association, and false advertising.

article thumbnail

"out of stock" not shown to be misleading when Walmart stopped stocking P's product

43(B)log

3d -, 2022 WL 16806210, No. 8, 2022) Stiles invented the “Stiles Razor,” a patented disposable razor with a narrow blade for precise shaving. Stiles alleged that it sold knockoff razors instead, infringing her patents, violating trademark and antitrust law, and interfering with her economic interests. Walmart, Inc.,

article thumbnail

selling allegedly stolen/converted merchandise isn't reverse passing off

43(B)log

3:21-CV-00499 (JCH), 2022 WL 313965 (D. 2, 2022) The parties have a dispute over control of a fashion business. But the complaint didn’t actually allege that defendants advertised items from “The Line,” only that they sold them. Second, more fundamentally, this was conversion/breach of contract, not false advertising.