Remove 2022 Remove Designs Remove False Advertising Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

What legal lines can’t NFTs cross? The Nike v StockX lawsuit may provide answers

IPilogue

On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc. sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. NFTs are unique digital assets that are digital representations of ownership of real-world items. These issues are novel in their involving the metaverse. The Nike Suit.

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

Meeker, 2022 WL 6507718, NO. 19, 2022) Judge Cannon has done some other stuff, too. This case concerns major players in the world of professional polo, their efforts to produce and clone genetically superior horses, and the ownership disputes that have arisen from those efforts.” La Dolfina S.A.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

selling allegedly stolen/converted merchandise isn't reverse passing off

43(B)log

3:21-CV-00499 (JCH), 2022 WL 313965 (D. 2, 2022) The parties have a dispute over control of a fashion business. But the complaint didn’t actually allege that defendants advertised items from “The Line,” only that they sold them. Second, more fundamentally, this was conversion/breach of contract, not false advertising.

article thumbnail

(c), TM, and other claims from busted partnership to sell colored copper fixtures

43(B)log

Stubenrauch, 2022 WL 2793579, No. 15, 2022) The parties in this case are former business associates, which is one reason there are so many different claims. Likewise, at this stage only, the court rejected the argument that plaintiffs failed to plead ownership of the copied elements. 3:21-cv-00545 (M.D.

article thumbnail

court allows Nike's legal theories and most of its expert testimony against StockX's resales/NFTs

43(B)log

NFT background: In early 2022, StockX introduced Vault NFTs, which featured Nike’s trademarks and provided the holder ownership of an associated physical item. As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in false advertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.”

article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

Zuluaga told a designer to look at Industria’s website when creating Latinfood’s packaging designs for Zenú and Ranchera and brought one of Industria’s Ranchera labels to the designer’s office. Advertisements made for Latinfood Zenú products used the phrase “una deliciosa tradición,” which translates to “a delicious tradition.”

article thumbnail

(c) ownership claim allows both (c) and Lanham Act claims on motion to dismiss

43(B)log

“Upon Darger’s death, the Lerners took control of his works under the allegedly false pretense that he had gifted the physical copies of his works and their associated copyrights to them.” In 2022, a distant relative was appointed as administrator of the Estate, which then sued.