Remove 2022 Remove Designs Remove Fair Use Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

My “Summer” 2022 Activities

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

That’s a long prelude to explaining how my “summer 2022” really dates back to November 2021 and won’t end until January. Nevertheless, as the semester has already started at Santa Clara Law, I’ll do my rundown of my 2022 outputs-to-date anyway. Regulation of Political Advertising (2022 Edition).

Editing 91
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Information, and Why It Matters in an Era of Information Surveillance?

IIPRD

Image Source : Shutterstock] The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill [1] , (DPDP) 2022 relates to any and all forms of personal data processing that are accomplished digitally. In addition to that, the “deemed consent” notion is presented in the DPDP Bill, 2022.

Privacy 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The defendants’ wholesale collection and use of copyrighted material, with no option for copyright owners to opt out, would exceed the legal interpretation of “fair use” (see VHT vs Zillow Group , 918 F.3d 2000) (“ copying an entire work militates against a finding of fair use. ”). 4th 1149 (9th Cir.

Fair Use 132
article thumbnail

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2022, in ML Genius v. While this conflict might seem minor (X’s users, after all, are not in the business of granting scraping licenses), the next one was not: Fair use. Judge Alsup suggested that X’s ToS conflict with copyright law by prohibiting scraping irrespective of whether it qualifies as fair use.

Blogging 127
article thumbnail

Anti-Circumvention Takedowns Aren’t Covered by 512(f)–Yout v. RIAA

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

2022 WL 4599203 (D. Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By Fair Use–Hosseinzadeh v. Weiner. * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v.

article thumbnail

Taking the Mona Lisa Effect from Illusion to Reality: Enhancing the Museum Experience with Augmented and Virtual Reality

JIPEL Copyright Blog

There are clear advantages to the use of these technologies in the museum context. Thus, in using the device to enhance their museum experience, visitors may inadvertently be exposing their private information for collection by third parties, and museums could unwittingly find themselves at the wrong end of a privacy lawsuit.

article thumbnail

NFTs: New Frontiers for Trademarks

IP Tech Blog

NFTs also may embody or use trademarks. For a succinct background on NFTs, see Your NFT Playbook , by our colleagues Kyle Fath, Alan Friel, and Carlton Daniel, posted in Consumer Privacy World. The Amended Complaint, filed on March 2, 2022, provides additional background and context for Hermès’ claims.