The IPKat

MAY 22, 2023

The use of AI technology to generate images or music and other creative works, has legal implications for copyright and related rights of creators and rightsholders. It has the capacity to run through a large number of tasks extremely quickly, which allows it to become more capable at performing tasks it has been trained to do.

Music 81

Music Intellectual Property Copyright Technology 81

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JANUARY 9, 2023

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I by Oleksandr Bulayenko , João Pedro Quintais , Joost Poort and Daniel Gervais. Yet, the very same automation poses challenges for the application of copyright law, increasing legal uncertainty, as demonstrated in this report vis-à-vis AI music outputs.

Copyright 93

Copyright Blogging Fair Use Reporting 93

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 3, 2023

To do so, it first discusses how AI image generation tools are trained and how copyright protected images are involved in that process. In summary- the availability of copyright protection for these images of besuited felines would make an ideal exam question for IP students. What is AI image generation software?

Litigation 143

Litigation Copying Copyright Designs 143

LexBlog IP

JUNE 28, 2023

The plaintiff, a leading multinational software manufacturer, owned the rights to exploit the programs. 3) According to the Court, the term “sale” used in article 41 of the Copyright Law must be interpreted in a broad sense.

Copying 52

Copying Copyright Law Copyright Editing 52

azrights

AUGUST 11, 2022

Would they be infringing your copyright though? Is the output infringing copyright? From a copyright law perspective, the initial use of copyright works by the platform for machine learning is infringing unless the platform used licensed or out-of-copyright works or could rely on a copyright defence, such as use for research purposes.

Copyright 97

Copyright Due Diligence Designs Design 97

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 18, 2022

This approach, referred to as “private ordering” or “self-regulation”, has been reflected in several EU Directives, and has long provided a useful workaround for governments by empowering industry actors to design and implement their own rules and methods of enforcement (given that they comply with existing law). Conclusion.

Copyright 52

Copyright Marketing Marketing Law 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 1, 2022

This included the highly controversial Articles 15 and 17 on, respectively, the new press publishers’ right (PPR) and the new copyright liability scheme for OCSSPs (“online content-sharing services providers”). Subject matter and right-holders. The post is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Reporting 52

Reporting Marketing Marketing Copyright 52