Remove 2022 Remove Contracts Remove Fair Use Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I’m pleased to announce the 2022 edition (13th edition) of my Internet Law casebook, Internet Law: Cases & Materials. For what it’s worth, this year I’ll teach the course in Spring 2023 instead of Fall 2022). I posted the 2022 version, so it’s as fresh as it gets. Toys ‘R’ Us v. Note About Fair Use.

Editing 141
article thumbnail

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

If the issue lies in loopholes within the ToS, the solution seems straightforward: draft tighter contracts and perhaps incorporate a browsewrap on your platforms to catch those who don’t hold accounts. X’s breach of contract cases against CCDH for violating its ToS by scraping also didn’t fare well. In 2022, in ML Genius v.

Blogging 127
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

My “Summer” 2022 Activities

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

That’s a long prelude to explaining how my “summer 2022” really dates back to November 2021 and won’t end until January. Nevertheless, as the semester has already started at Santa Clara Law, I’ll do my rundown of my 2022 outputs-to-date anyway. Regulation of Political Advertising (2022 Edition).

Editing 91
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2024 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

However, it did involve an edge outcome (the presence of a unilateral amendment clause infected the whole contract) that hasn’t come up often since it was issued. I posted the 2022 version. The chapter makes a nice module to add discussion about online contracts to another course. Contracts Meyer v. Overview Noah v.

Editing 101
article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. But fair use isn’t a defense to a breach of contract claim.

article thumbnail

NFTs: New Frontiers for Trademarks

IP Tech Blog

NFTs also may embody or use trademarks. For a succinct background on NFTs, see Your NFT Playbook , by our colleagues Kyle Fath, Alan Friel, and Carlton Daniel, posted in Consumer Privacy World. The Amended Complaint, filed on March 2, 2022, provides additional background and context for Hermès’ claims.

article thumbnail

Taking the Mona Lisa Effect from Illusion to Reality: Enhancing the Museum Experience with Augmented and Virtual Reality

JIPEL Copyright Blog

prevent intentional modification of their work and attribution to the modified work) claims by claiming fair use under § 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, which permits fair use of a protected work for purposes such as criticism, comment, teaching, scholarship, or research.