The IPKat

DECEMBER 14, 2023

February: In Nigeria, the Business Facilitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, 2022 , was signed into law. Stephen Mouka issued a Cease and Desist Notice to the public after an X user created and shared a limited merchandise bearing the slogan. Today, it’s about the trade marks. Katpost on the decision here.

IP 81

IP Service Mark Cease and Desist Registration 81

IP Tech Blog

AUGUST 17, 2022

The recycled bottles did not bear the Tsingtao labels and marks, which had been replaced by the label and trademarks of the smaller brewery. In particular, Tsingtao alleged that such use of its registered trademark created in the relevant users the impression that the small breweries’ beer and brand was somewhat related to Tsingtao Beer.

Trademark 104

Trademark Registering Trademarks Art Cease and Desist 104

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 17, 2022

The recycled bottles did not bear the Tsingtao labels and marks, which had been replaced by the label and trademarks of the smaller brewery. 7) causing harm to other’s exclusive rights to use registered trademarks.” 7) causing harm to other’s exclusive rights to use registered trademarks.”

Trademark 52

Trademark Registering Trademarks Art Cease and Desist 52

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 5, 2024

Trademark owners frequently used cease and desist letters to pressure infringers to stop using their marks without authorization before taking legal action. The registration and management of trademarks was another essential component.

Trademark 89

Trademark Social Media Advertising Advertising 89

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Regardless, it sent a cease and desist to the defendants in 2022 who have a shop in Jaipur with a similar name and have registered the word mark in 2013. In this case, the Plaintiff, who is the proprietor of the mark “Footlockers” since 1988, has not used it for 30 years. vs M/S Sach Industries & Ors.

Designs 52

Designs Design Trademark Cease and Desist 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused registration of “Trump Too Small” under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act ( 15 USC 1052(c) ) because the phrase includes a living individual’s name without his written consent. Tam (2017) and Iancu v. The text of Section 2(c) is viewpoint-neutral.

Registration 75

Registration Trademark Blogging Law 75