2022 Artistic Work Artwork Registration 
Intellectual Property Law Blog
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship ( Thaler v. Shortly following the Thaler decision, another artistic work created with generative AI was denied copyright protection. It cited its AI Registration Guidance, 88 Fed. Perlmutter, et.
SpicyIP
SEPTEMBER 9, 2023
On September 5, 2023, as explained here , the US Copyright Office (USCO) issued an interesting decision in a copyright registration matter that involved AI-generated work. Previously, in the Thaler case , the US Copyright Office had refused to register an AI-generated work since the application named the AI-system as the author.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kashishipr
AUGUST 17, 2022
Content creators and social media influencers work sincerely to build their reputation for expertise in specific industries, products, and topics. As per a report, influencer marketing investment is expected to reach $15 billion in 2022. It currently accounts for about 15% of the entire revenue spent on global advertising.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship ( Thaler v. ” The application asserted that the work was created autonomously by the machine and listed the machine as the author. .” It cited its AI Registration Guidance, 88 Fed.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 17, 2023
Image from DALL-E 3 Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push users’ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e.,
SpicyIP
MARCH 11, 2024
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s use of “Café Social” for its restaurant in Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh infringes its trademark as it copied the “Social” word mark and the plaintiff’s distinctive artwork representing its trademark. Both the parties have registrations over their respective “Karim” and “Kareem” trademarks.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
147 
Let's personalize your content