This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If you are contemplating registering a servicemark that primarily benefits your company and not others, don’t bother; it will be refused registration. 4, 2021) [not precedential] (CHiP). By: BakerHostetler
The Board observed that "[t]he critical inquiry in determining whether a proposed mark functions as a trademark is how the relevant public perceives the term sought to be registered." 2021 WL 839189, at *13. Simply calling A S LIVE FOREVER a brand cannot transform an otherwise unregistrable designation into a registrablemark."
If you are contemplating registering a servicemark that primarily benefits your company and not others, don’t bother; it will be refused registration. 4, 2021) [not precedential] ( CHiP ). The TTAB affirmed the refusal to register, denying registration under sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Trademark Act.
If you are contemplating registering a servicemark that primarily benefits your company and not others, don’t bother; it will be refused registration. 4, 2021) [not precedential] ( CHiP ). The TTAB affirmed the refusal to register, denying registration under sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Trademark Act.
On December 10, 2021, the TTAB issued a precedential decision reminding trademark practitioners and applicants that servicemark use requires that an applicant actually render the services recited in the trademark application; mere preparation to render the services is insufficient. 10, 2021).
If you desire to register a servicemark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
If you desire to register a servicemark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). ” Id.
Applicant Suuberg made preparatory measures to use the mark but never rendered the services before her filing date. 88234650 (December 10, 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas). What is the first use date for the restaurant's services? Welch 2021. In re Alessandra Suuberg , Serial No. See Stawski v.
Respondent's rope-a-dope defense proved to be successful in this cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark ONEPACKET (standard form) for computer-related services. 92069714 (July 2, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. What if the registrant has no intent one way or the other?
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or servicemark. A threshold question in evaluating the registrability of a trademark or servicemark is whether the proposed mark meets the source indication requirement.
Here are three recent TTAB rulings, each sustaining an opposition based upon non-use of the opposed servicemark. For a servicemark, the services must be rendered in order to qualify as "use in commerce" as defined in Section 45 of the Lanham Act. Substring, LLC , Opposition No. Cavalier Rescue of Alabama, Inc.
Per the Complaint, Plaintiffs have used the getGo® trademark since at least March 2013 and have sought and secured federal trademark registrations for various getGo® trademarks and logos as set forth below (the “getGo® Marks”). Registration No. ServiceMarkRegistrations, Nos.
Sections 1 and 2 provide for registration of "trademark[s] by which goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others." Section 3 states that servicemarks are registrable "in the same manner and with the same effect as trademarks." are not registrable." of Kentucky v. Brunetti controls here.
CHRISTMAS became a registered trademark for “Christmas Ornaments and Decorations of the Non-Electrical Type” way back in 1966 (Registration No. ” Scrooge wasn’t the only one who had that idea: a business owner registered ALWAYS CHRISTMAS & Design as a servicemark in 1995 (Registration No.
In doing so the Board held that video game characters are not per se registrable without a showing that they function as marks. Color was not claimed as part of the mark. [1] ” Instead, Applicant argued that any display of the character on the specimens submitted to support registration suffices to show use as a trademark.
Petitioner JNF LLC was undoubtedly unhappy with the result of its petition to cancel a registration for the mark HAPPIEST HOUR for bar and restaurant services. JNF claimed prior use of THE HAPPIEST HOUR for the identical services, but it failed to prove priority. Carson , 2021 USPQ2d 1057, at *21. See Couture v.
On September 17, 2021, the Third Circuit held in Beasley v. In 1997, Beasley obtained a New Jersey state servicemark for THE EBONYS. Patent & Trademark Office (“PTO”) (THE EBONYS, Registration No. 4,170,469 [the “’469 mark”]).
PureThink, LLC, 2021 WL 2483778, No. May 18, 2021) Neo4j specializes in graph database management systems. It has trademark registrations for the word mark “NEO4J.” Neo4j, Inc. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD (N.D. I still don’t know what that means, but ok.]
35: TTAB Grants MIRAGE BRANDS Cancellation Petition Due To Likelihood of Reverse Confusion On Remand from the CAFC, TTAB Denies Petition for Cancellation of "NAKED" Registration for Condoms TTABlog Test: Three Recent Section 2(d) Inter Partes Cases - How Did They Come Out? [Yes] Precedential No. Lack of Bona Fide Intent: Precedential No.
Here in a nutshell is the query the Court addressed: 16 Under Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001, trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character shall not be registered. ”; see also ILN Today, July 15, 2021. .” ”; see also ILN Today, July 15, 2021. ” Ardagh at par. Duck Boat Tours, Inc.
It also produced documents during discovery supposedly disclosing an event held prior to April 2021 in the United States but shown to be referencing a 2023 event in Shanghai China. Opposer DoorDash alleged likelihood of confusion with eight registered DOORDASH marks for various goods and services, including food delivery.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content