Remove 2021 Remove Contracts Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In reliance, AHBP allegedly hired employees and designers, consulted with lawyers, accountants, biologists and virologists, rented warehouse and office space, and entered into contracts with buyers in Argentina. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.

article thumbnail

Contract remedies again prove broader than false advertising for pandemic-related suits

43(B)log

3d -, 2021 WL 790638 (S.D.N.Y. 26, 2021) These are two putative class actions against Columbia and Pace based on allegedly broken promises due to the pandemic. Thus, some but not all breach of contract claims survived. A reversal of the usual result: contract claims are usually much narrower than unfair trade practices claims.]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Dastar doesn't bar allegedly false advertising about source of planned development services

43(B)log

Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. False advertising: This one survived: By listing LStar developments under the heading “Oak City Representative Developments,” “the proposal necessarily implies that defendant Oak City developed those properties.” LStar Development Gp., 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. What about injury? “[H]ere

article thumbnail

handful of bad Amazon reviews make Energizer's false advertising claims plausible

43(B)log

2021 WL 2453394, No. 16, 2021) Along with breach of contract and tortious interference claims, Energizer alleged that MTA falsely advertised by selling batteries with Energizer’s mark and then by fulfilling orders with products different from those advertised and shipping batteries to consumers that were “used, aged, or tampered-with.”

article thumbnail

TM claimant may add false advertising claims as direct competitor

43(B)log

Roach, 2021 WL 4134836, No. 1, 2021) Entrepreneur, a frequent trademark claimant, sought to amend its complaint and add new parties to the TM claims here. Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for false advertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.” Entrepreneur Media, Inc.

article thumbnail

tortious interference claim from false advertising survives, but why bother?

43(B)log

3d -, 2021 WL 2433944, No. 15, 2021) Logistick sells disposable load bars which are used to secure cargo freight during transport. Comment: I often tell students that, absent individually negotiated contracts for six figures or more, tortious interference claims just run up the lawyers’ bills. Logistick, Inc. AB Airbags, Inc.,

article thumbnail

sending emails under former employees' names may be reverse passing off

43(B)log

CCM counterclaimed for abuse of process and for violations of the Lanham Act and related state laws; one ex-employee also brought counterclaims against loanDepot for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived. Ankura Consulting Grp.,