2021 Artwork Copying Intellectual Property Law 
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Emily Prieur is an IPilogue Writer and a 3L JD Candidate at Queen’s University Faculty of Law. . In September 2021, Indigenous model and activist Quannah Chasinghorse turned heads at the Met Gala wearing a gold cut-out gown by Peter Dundas and traditional Navajo turquoise jewelry. Collective Ownership Over Cultural Artwork.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022
June 2021: Roc-A-Fella Records sues its co-founder Damon Dash, alleging that Dash’s attempt to mint Jay-Z’s album “Reasonable Doubt” as an NFT constituted unlawful conversion of the copyright in the album owned by Roc-A-Fella. Hermes Int’l et al. Rothschild , Case No. Roc-A-Fella Records, Inc. Dash , Case No.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 28, 2022
10 of 2021, dated May 21, 2021. Intellectual property rights are a key consideration when it comes to NFTs because they contain art, music, videos, pictures, and other creations. Provisions of intellectual property law will be applicable to NFTs. MOCI Regulation No. electronic data deletion.
IIPRD
JANUARY 29, 2023
A person who employed the artist will be considered the proprietor of the artwork and can register for exclusivity for the same character. [3] 5] The content creator reached out to the artist for a commissioned artwork which is a unique character design. The corporation also steps in cases of violation of the IP of the VTuber. [8]
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 21, 2022
billion in sales in 2021 alone, the non-fungible token (“NFT”) has recently undergone a dramatic rise in prominence in the cryptoverse, similar to the “crypto summer” of 2017-18 or the “DeFi summer” of 2020. By: Joshua Durham. With an astounding $17.7 What is the (Legal) Bottom Line?
Intellectual Property Law Blog
JUNE 5, 2023
2] The Court’s decision affirmed the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the Warhol work was derivative of the original, and noted that “the new expression may be relevant to whether a copying use has a sufficiently distinct purpose or character” but that factor was not dispositive by itself. [3] Goldsmith, No.
The IPKat
AUGUST 24, 2021
For museums, there are now exceptions for digital displays of collection works on dedicated terminals and, in certain situations, for making preservation and replacement copies. It is a compact and no-nonsense guide to the often complex interrelations between the visual arts and intellectual property law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
103 
Let's personalize your content