Remove 2021 Remove Advertising Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

Not a Trademark Case: Edible vs Google at the Georgia Supreme Court

Patently-O

Google (GA 2021). This interesting case is pending before the Supreme Court of Georgia over the question of keyword advertising under Georgia law. The law [of Georgia] protects its right to exclude others from trading on that name and its associated good will for profit. by Dennis Crouch. Edible IP v. Constitution.

Trademark 100
article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

2021 WL 3117239 (C.D. June 7, 2021). The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. Case citation : Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. YouTube , Divino v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Winzo v Google- Missed Opportunity to Detail out Disparagement

SpicyIP

This results in common claims of ‘disparagement’ in trademark law. Previously, trademark cases have been entertained in situations where disclaimers/ warnings have been given along with products. Furthermore, it was held that there was no infringement of trademark under section 29 of the Trademarks Act (‘the Act’).

article thumbnail

Preventing Trademark Infringement or Stifling Healthy Competition? A Look at 1-800 Contacts and its Keyword Advertising Battle

LexBlog IP

It is difficult to remember a time when keyword advertising did not dominate the internet. Most search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo, maintain keyword advertising programs which allow advertisers to bid on search terms and keywords that drive customers searching for a particular product or service to their website.

article thumbnail

Trademark Battle Between Restaurant and Man Who Wants 1.5 Million Dollars

IPilogue

A month later, the restaurant found an advertisement posted by Meng for the sale of the registration of the JU DIAN & Design Mark for $100,000. It was reasonable to infer that Meng knowingly obtained the trademark registration associated with Beijing Judian in China to leverage the restaurant’s reputation for his own economic interests.

Trademark 111
article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

And the number of active trademark registrations in the USPTO database is larger than ever. Additionally, since late December 2021, when new procedures went into effect, the USPTO has received around 100 expungement petitions and about 100 re-examination petitions to get rid of registrations for marks that are allegedly not in use.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

TTABlog Quarterly Index: April - June 2021

The TTABlog

Failure to Function/Specimens of Use/Nonuse: TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal of NIGGA for Clothing Llama Design Mark Fails to Function as a Trademark for Video Game Software, Says TTAB "DEHYDRATION RELIEF FAST" Incapable of Functioning as a Trademark for Hydration Solution Products, Says TTAB Precedential No. Welch 2021.