article thumbnail

Patent Protection on AI Inventions

Intellectual Property Law Blog

1 are defined in an article published in 2020 by the USPTO. In the following sections, we will discuss an illustrative list of subject areas that may offer patentable AI inventions. (1) The figure below shows the volume of public AI patent applications categorized by AI component in the U.S. from 1990-2018. 1) Training phase.

Invention 242
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows AIA Grace Period: Public Disclosure Must Make Invention ‘Reasonably Available’

Patently-O

Kaijet highlights the narrowness of the pre-filing grace period (safe harbor) provision under the America Invents Act (AIA) and serves as a reminder that there are a number of patents that would have been valid under the pre-AIA patent system may no longer be valid under the current law. HyperDrive apparently embodies the claimed invention.

Invention 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Pandemic Isn’t Over, Nor is the USTPO’s Fast Track Program for COVID-Related Inventions

IP Tech Blog

The COVID-19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program was implemented in May 2020 to encourage independent inventors and small businesses to bring important and possibly life-saving COVID related inventions to market more quickly, as explained in the USPTO’s announcement at that time.

Invention 115
article thumbnail

Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, FKA Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc., v. Modernatx, Inc., FKA Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. No. 2020-1183 (Fed. Cir. April 11, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Background The ’127 patent is directed to an invention that provides stable nucleic acid-lipid particles (“SNALP”) that have non-lamellar structure and “comprise a nucleic acid … methods of making SNALP, and methods of delivering and/or administering the SNALP.” ’127 2020) (quoting In re Kubin , 561 F.3d 127 patent, Abstract.

Art 130
article thumbnail

AI Systems May Invent, But Are They Inventors?

The IP Law Blog

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? Stephen L.

article thumbnail

Understanding IPO’s Rejection of UPL’s Patent Application for Mancozeb and Ortho Silicic Acid Combination in Light of the Patent Bargain and Sufficiency of Disclosure

SpicyIP

The essence of the patent regime lies in, the ‘patent bargain’ – inventors are granted a monopoly over their invention for a fixed term of 20 years in exchange for a complete disclosure. Under Section 10(4), an applicant is supposed to disclose the best method of performing the invention in the complete specification.

article thumbnail

Are AI Inventions Harder to Patent?

JD Supra Law

For a recent article published in Law360, we looked at data from the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) covering both AI and non-AI inventions from 2015 to 2020. By: Goodwin