This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In our new paper, The Truth About DesignPatents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. designpatents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of designpatents: Half of all designpatent applications are rejected. Acquiring DesignPatents.
WIPO administers the WIPO-administered Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. In 2015, the US linked its designpatent system with Hague — this gives U.S. designers easier access to global design rights; and non-U.S. designpatent system. by Dennis Crouch.
by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of designpatents. Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate designpatent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § GM Global Tech. Operations LLC , No.
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 2020-1940 (Oct. 4, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed a decision by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal…. By: Quarles & Brady LLP
In December 2020, the USPTO put out a request for comments on “The Article of Manufacture Requirement.” (For Last week, at Design Day 2022, the USPTO announced that it had completed its summary of those comments. Projected designs are simply not some new, unforeseen concept. We have utility patents for that.
In a dispute over the validity of designpatents covering the fenders of GM’s 2018-2020 Chevrolet Equinox, the Federal Circuit overturned its own long-standing Rosen-Durling “rigid” standard for assessing obviousness of designpatents, returning to a “flexible” standard that will make it easier for parties to challenge the validity of designpatents (..)
The concept of Metaverse as an online framework for economic interoperability was born in and around 2020. Are they protectable by designpatents? In this post we will analyze the availability of designpatents for digital commodities and how it compares with other Asian countries like Japan, South Korea and Singapore.
Continuing the trend that we analyzed in May 2020, petitions to the US Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) requesting inter partes review or post-grant review for designpatents maintained an institution rate well below 50% in 2020.
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has published a notice with supplemental guidance for its staff members examining designpatent claims that include computer-generated images.
In May 2020, we reported in an article published by Law360, “designpatents outperform utility patents when it comes to injunctive relief.” The same is true when it comes to a rare form of injunctive relief—a general exclusion order (GEO)—issued in Section 337 investigations by the US International Trade Commission (ITC).
What is the designpatent infringement test? The test for designpatent infringement involves a visual comparison between the patenteddesign and the accused product. Practically speaking, it means that the ordinary observer knows that what designs already existed before the filing of the patenteddesign.
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. 1] Likewise, designpatents are not subject to attacks under 35 U.S.C. § ” [6]. ” [6]. 1] 35 U.S.C. § § 289. [2]
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. For example, designpatents allow for recovery of “total profits” — not just lost profits or reasonable royalties as provided for infringed utility patents. [1]
Between 2005 and 2020 the number of U.S. designpatent grants almost tripled. The increased focus on product form (“look”) as a part of function, Continue reading
The concept of Metaverse as an online framework for economic interoperability was born in and around 2020. Are they protectable by designpatents? In this post we will analyze the availability of designpatents for digital commodities and how it compares with other Asian countries like Japan, South Korea and Singapore.
designpatents continue to grow in popularity. Although 2021 saw a slight downtick in the number of issued designpatents compared to the previous two years—most likely caused by lower filings during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic—the number of U.S. designpatents that issued in 2012.
36 Judgment without any opinion (the original complaint included some designpatents as well). This is an interesting new trademark petition that suggests some nuance from the Court’s 2020 decision in BOOKING.COM. On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed in a R.36 Australian Leather has now petitioned to the U.S.
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 2020-1940 (Oct. The holding of SurgiSil does just that, and will thus have very significant implications for designpatent applicants now and in the future.
The parties faced off in a rematch at the Federal Circuit following an earlier bout involving the same designpatent, U.S. In addition to challenging the Federal Circuit’s 2020 decision in Columbia v. Oral arguments were held on Thursday, January 12, 2023, in Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
This report summarized public comments received in response to a December 2020 request by the USPTO. Only two days after being sworn in, Director Kathi Vidal announced the release of the USPTO’s Summary of public views on the article of manufacture requirement of 35 U.S.C. § manufacturers.
Fish Principals Craig Deutsch , Jennifer Huang , and Grace Kim , discuss challenging designpatents at the PTAB in their Law360 Expert Analysis article. Challenging designpatents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is difficult — nearly two-thirds of petitions directed to designpatents have been denied institution.
These appear to be the first—and certainly the first precedential—Federal Circuit cases dealing with the merits of one of the numerous “Schedule A” designpatent cases that have been filed in recent years in the NDIL. It is clear, from reading the decision, that the designpatent infringement claims lacked merit.
In In re SurgiSil LLP, [2020-1940] (October 4, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision affirming an examiner’s rejection of SurgiSil’s designpatent application No. 29/491,550 on an “ornamental design for a lip implant as shown and described.”.
Last week, the Federal Circuit decided to consider, en banc , whether the Supreme Court’s 2007 KSR decision regarding obviousness overruled the Federal Circuit’s decades-old Rosen and Durling tests for designpatents, setting in motion a potential lowering of the bar for obviousness. In re Rosen , 673 F.2d 3d 100 (Fed.
Like 2020 before it, 2021 has been a year of change for global design protection. Countries like Korea continue to update their rules to deal with the realities of modern, virtual design. China enacted a big modernization to its design laws, bringing them more in line with international norms.
So much so that the post-1902 Act regional circuit designpatent cases invalidating designpatents on functionality grounds would come out oppositely under the Federal Circuit’s lax standards. Universal Robots then filed a design application for the UR5 in January 2020. DesignPatent No.
2020-2344, 2021-1019] (August 19, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB determination that U.S. DesignPatent Nos. In Campbell Soup Company v. Gamon Plus, Inc., D612,646 and D621,645 would not have been obvious. By: Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
Over the last 20 years, the total number of designpatents issued per year in the United States has erupted. As illustrated in the graph below and further highlighted in this animated graph, in the 30 year period between the years 1971 and 2000 a total of nearly 219,000 designpatents were issued by the U.S.
From October 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021, 1629 petitions were filed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Mechanical and business method petitions are second, biopharma petitions third, chemical petitions fourth and finally, designpatent petitions last. 20, 2020, designated as precedential May 5, 2020).
21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned designpatents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. They also allegedly used Deetch’s image in ads and on packaging, and allegedly falsely claimed on Amazon that their pillow products “were designed in the United States but are manufactured in China.”
Ferrari was issued a new designpatent D945,320 titled, “Car, Toy Car Replica And/Or Other Replica.” ” While this patent does not mention the specific model of vehicle for the design, the look bears similarity to the Scuderia Ferrari SF1000 that raced in the 2020 Formula One season.
17, 2023) Last week, the USPTO released a document entitled “Supplemental Guidance for Examination of DesignPatent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Electronic Images, Including Computer-Generated Icons and Graphical User Interfaces.” The statutory subject matter provision for designpatents, 35 U.S.C. §
As for long-term goals, ‘The Outline’ (2008) put forward the idea, among other things, that by 2020 China would become a country with an elevated level of creation, utilisation, protection and administration of IPR. the number of high-value invention patents per 10,000 population) will be presented clearly and fulfilled timely.
Johnson claims it owns multiple utility and designpatents including those at issue in this case, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,022,332 , 10,684,029 , 10,528,013 , 8,826,165 , 8,190,728 , D788,785 , D924,888 , D924,890 (collectively, “Asserted Patents”).
Last week, the Federal Circuit Court reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in In re Surgisil, L.L.P., overturning the Board’s ruling that a design for a rolled-paper art tool for blending anticipated Surgisil’s (Applicant) claimed lip implant. 2020-1940, 2021 WL 4515275 (Fed. In re Surgisil, L.L.P.,
Part 5: The IP Hidden Gems: Trade Secrets and Industrial Designs. Patenting software, and inventions related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning, known as computer-implemented inventions (CII) in patent lingo, is a complicated and evolving area.
33: "LOCH MOOSE MONSTER" Fends Off Monster Energy's Lack-of-Bona-Fide-Intent Summary Judgment Motion Nonuse/Specimen of Use: USPTO Issues Examination Guide 1-21: Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings Under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 Precedential No. Lack of Bona Fide Intent: Precedential No.
In fact, Track One utility patent applications had an average success rate of over 86% for the decade starting from 2011 to 2020. In 2020, Track One had an average success rate of 89% compared to 81% for non-prioritized utility applications.
.” Further to high-ranking officials from the USPTO, there were a plurality other presentations and conversations amongst members of the design law community that included private practice prosecutors and litigators, in-house counsel, industrial designers, USPTO Examiners, and product design expert witnesses.
Gamon Plus, Inc. , [2020-2344, 2021-1019] (August 19, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB determination that U.S. DesignPatent Nos. The ’646 and ’645 patents, which each claim “[t]he ornamental design for a gravity feed dispenser display, as shown and described. DesignPatent No.
Two single judge benches comprising Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur (for IPR matters 2020 onwards) and Justice Krishna Rao (for IPR matters upto 2019) have also been notified in the new roster. The Delhi HC and Madras HC are the other two HCs with a dedicated IP Division and the Karnataka HC has already formed a sub-committee for the same.
It has been debated whether NFTs/DC could be protected in China by designpatents. The current tendency is that of denying protection to designs of non-physical products, like metaverses. For more details on the topic of design and the metaverse in China see our previous blog post.
.” This is exactly what happened to Jaguar Land Rover in its claim against Land Wind (Jiangling Motors) in China for copying of Jaguar Land Rover’s car design. After their patent battle from 2014 to [2019], the designpatents of Jaguar Land Rover and Land Wind for their off-road vehicles were invalidated by each other.
The Battle Between Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech Continues The litigation surrounding mRNA patent thickens in the USA as Pfizer/ BioNTech files defence and counterclaims against the patent infringement allegations made by Moderna. This post was originally published in Bill of Health , the blog of Petrie-Flom Center at Harvard Law School.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content