This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Against that background, this blog post provides some tentative musings on the impact of text-to-image generators on human artistic creativity by analysing recent US and Canadian copyright registrations for artisticworks. For simplicity, I will label this ‘commercial significant artistic creativity’.
As reported, in 2020, the copyright office rejected an application which listed AI (RAGHAV) as the sole author for an artwork. This copyright office granted registration in this case. The basis of grant of registration is not clear. The basis of grant of registration is not clear. A worrisome paradox.
Under Section 2(c) of The Copyright Act of 1957 , the label is an original artisticwork. It was in October 2020 when SSPL came to know about NTC’s use of a similar label and trade dress for its set of soya bean edible oil products. In May 2007, the label mark ‘SOYA DROP’ was registered.
US Copyright Office issues another ruling on AI-authorship and copyright, reaffirming its decision to reject Ankit Sahni and RAGHAV’s artisticwork. Subject work on which copyright registration was sought. Interestingly, the artwork also led to controversy in India when it was granted registration in November 2020.
There is no registration fee for any of the seminars. Though he applied in 1992, registration was granted only in 2020. The plaintiff, a proprietary firm, held a registered trademark (ARJUN) since 1993 and a copyright for its artisticwork, with claimed use since 1978. Read the post for more details.
C-42 , the following conditions must be met for a copyright to be conferred to an author of an artisticwork:(1) the work must be original; (2) the person must be the author of the work; and (3) they must, at the date of its creation, be either a Canadian citizen or a citizen of a signatory country on the Berne Convention (para 26).
Mandabach sued under §43(a) and coordinate state law claims and sought cancellation of a trademark registration. If we got rid of the bizarre idea that Rogers was about artisticworks and correctly labeled it as being about commercial speech, courts would do much better. Did Mandabach have valid marks?
1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artisticworks as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright. These registrations aid in allocating precedence.
According to the Indian Design Act, if your design is registered under the Designs Act it is not eligible for protection under Copyright Act, even if it is artisticwork. Each piece was carefully handmade within the studio kitchen of the famous food artist Prudence Staite. It is an either-or choice.
If the author is a foreign natural person or legal entity, the product design or 3D packaging may be protected as a foreign work of applied art under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks (“Berne Convention”) for 25 years in China. For comparison, U.S. Like in the U.S.,
15(1) of the Berne Convention on the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks 1971 [ Berne ], which requires the author to prevail if their name appears on the work in the usual manner. Registration then provides all the contrary proof needed for the registrant to rebut the author/owner presumption ( Act, s.
In the instant case where both the parties were involved in manufacturing water storage pipes, the appellant sought the removal of the respondent’s copyright registration for an artisticwork titled “Gauri Aqua Plast,” claiming it was deceptively similar to its own registered work “Plasto.”
The section 2(c) of the 1957 Copyright Act of India defines ‘artisticwork’ as any work that includes engraving, sculpture, painting, or a photograph. So what kind of works, provided they meet the requirement, qualify for copyright protection? Understanding tattoos through the lens of copyright What exactly is a tattoo?
The section 2(c) of the 1957 Copyright Act of India defines ‘artisticwork’ as any work that includes engraving, sculpture, painting, or a photograph. So what kind of works, provided they meet the requirement, qualify for copyright protection? Understanding tattoos through the lens of copyright What exactly is a tattoo?
The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in 1883 and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks in 1886 both acknowledged the significance of the intellectual property. The World Intellectual Property Organization administers both accords (WIPO).”. Image Source: gettyimage].
On 30 July 2020, DC filed a Notice of Opposition and Statement of Grounds. A key issue identified by the Hearing Officer was the use of WONDER WOMAN as a trade mark and the comparisons that could be drawn between it being used as the title of an artisticwork.
Image from here SpicyIP Tidbit: India-Pakistan Basmati Dispute Dismissed by DHC Adding another layer of spice to the Basmati rice IP dispute between India and Pakistan, recently the Delhi High Court dismissed the 15 years old suit against the export of Basmati rice by India, for non-prosecution from the plaintiff since 2020.
On copyright subsistence, the judge held that the Mark with Text is an artisticwork, failing within the sub-category of “graphic works”. As part of this scheme, in September 2020, Tesco introduced the Clubcard Prices promotion: Tesco Clubcard holders were given discounts at the point of sale on certain products.
The court notes that “the single legal question presented here is whether a work generated autonomously by a computer falls under the protection of copyright law upon its creation” Thaler v. United States copyright law protects only works of human creation” Id. Perlmutter , 1:22-cv-01564, 6 (D.D.C. photographs).
First, it argued that the plaintiff concealed material information that the registration of its mark was removed for non renewal in 2010 and was renewed only in 2019. Second, the defendant was able to obtain copyright and trademark registrations for its device marks during the above interim phase.
The Court held that plaintiff has made out a clear prima facie case; that the plaintiff has the necklace registered in Italy and since India is a member of Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and ArtisticWorks, under Section 40 of the Copyrights Act, 1957 the registration in Italy can prove copyright infringement in India.
Since October 2020, NBA Top Shot (an NFT marketplace created by the NBA that allows fans to buy and sell NFTs of highlight videos featuring their favourite players) has generated more than $200 million USD in sales. Multiple pieces of copyright material may exist in a single digital work.
of total exports in 2020–2021 [3]. Furthermore, if a design is eligible for registration within the Designs Act, 2000 but has not been registered, it can only be protected within the Copyrights Act if its owner produces it in an “industrial process” no more than fifty times.
Indeed, the PTO has increased its focus on whether the use an applicant is making is trademark use, as opposed to ornamental or informational use, in its registration decisions. Thus, even though it would be possible to have a registrable llama logo that functioned as a trademark, that’s not what Epic had.
As noted by Professor Jake Linford , the examples used by the Court when it discusses application of the Rogers test focus on uses in the title or content of artisticworks (not on T-shirts).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content