IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 20, 2023

Accordingly, assuming the ownership is conceded to AI, making such a transfer would be troublesome Fourthly, under Section 57, author has Moral rights, incorporates right to paternity and right to integrity. 7] We can expect a huge change in such manner right away. 1996) 38 DRJ 81 (India). [2] 2] Supra note 17. [3]

Ownership 80

Ownership Moral Rights Public Domain Intellectual Property 80

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

Although the user derives some benefit from the meme without purchasing or licensing the underlying content, the creator of the content also uniquely benefits from the increased exposure to individuals who may not otherwise interact with their content. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v]

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Topics include access and substantial similarity, fair use, performers’ rights, moral rights, expert testimony, the role of lay listeners, sound sampling, as demonstrated in dispositions of litigated and settled infringement disputes.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Registration Editing 67

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Derivative Work 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

The BGH stated in 2018 that when interpreting (contractual) cease and desist agreements in cases of doubt cease and desist obligation must be interpreted as meaning that its effect has the same scope as the statutory claim for injunctive relief. Injunctive relief (Section 97(1) UrhG) and cease and desist agreements.

Contracts 98

Contracts Copyright Law Cease and Desist 98

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 30, 2023

The third defendant was licensed to produce and market the disputed foods and spices under its own name and at its own expense, paying a fixed fee to the plaintiff for each individual product sold. The plaintiff claimed that he alone decided the composition of these products and that this was known to the third defendant. Emphasis added.)

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Related Rights Art 52

IIPRD

JANUARY 29, 2023

The issues pertaining to the rights of VTubers encompass rights to the design of the character, the privacy of the individual, licensing and taking inspiration from an existing character. This instance brings out certain questions when will the work be considered as commissioned, contract for service or implied license?

IP 52

IP Artwork Contracts Intellectual Property 52