2018 Derivative Work Social Media 
Copyright Lately
APRIL 20, 2025
Two of the countrys most influential appellate courtsthe Second and Seventh Circuitsare now weighing a deceptively arcane but potentially far-reaching question: Can a former licensee keep enforcing exclusive rights under the Copyright Acts derivative works exception, even after the original grant has been terminated?
Copyright Lately
FEBRUARY 20, 2022
After Marvel’s successor Disney released a new Muppet Babies reboot in 2018 without providing him credit or compensation, Scott filed a lawsuit for copyright infringement and breach of contract in the Central District of California. The case didn’t get very far as a result of a somewhat unusual set of circumstances. View Fullscreen.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPL Online
NOVEMBER 1, 2021
Mods are beneficial for the video game industry, [3] but mods can threaten a company’s copyright exclusivity because of their status as derivative works. [4] Section 106 of the Copyright Act grants copyright holders an exclusive right to make or license derivative works based upon a previously copyrighted work. [11]
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. addition of written or pictorial elements) of a work not in the public domain and/or where the creator is still alive.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
Basically, corporations must employ someone willing to scour the internet and report such infringing content by either filing Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices, reporting such individual posts via the methods provided by social media platforms, or both. 277 (2020). [iv] iv] Maxwell L. Stearns, Todd J.
Copyright Lately
OCTOBER 3, 2022
That $3,750 works out to a measly $71 for each month the case has been pending. If this type of derivative work isn’t protected under an implied license, or as a de minimis or fair use, it would fundamentally disrupt settled expectations of the tattoo and entertainment industries. What’s at Stake.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 1, 2023
How are photographers supposed to get the attention of those publishers without displaying samples of their work? In other words, the gist of the case is whether the photographers surrender their right to exclude others by voluntarily posting their own photos to social media. Breitbart News Network, LLC , 302 F. 3d 585 (S.D.N.Y.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
56 
Let's personalize your content