Remove 2018 Remove Contracts Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Ownership of Copyrights Patents and Trademarks are Created by Employees and Independent Contractors

IP and Legal Filings

Copyright: The copyright protection is given by Indian Law under The Copyright Act, 1957, supported through Copyright Rules, 2018. This may be for a limited period and is only limited to publishing, rendering left of the ownership to the author. Hence, the overall construction of the Copyright Act is fulfilling the righteous needs.

article thumbnail

The Other ‘Maybe’ Authors: Copyright Ownership for AI Trainers

IP Intelligence

Combine that “mastermind/dominant” author doctrine with the run of cases discussing ownership of software outputs (i.e., Copyright Office (the Office) when it comes to copyright ownership of artificial intelligence (AI) output. 2018) (citing Design Data Corp. The Office has answered that question with a resounding “maybe.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Implied Contracts with the Government over Counterfeit Coins

Patently-O

United States does focus on counterfeiting coins as well as implied contracts with the Federal Government. In 2018, The Portland Mint delivered over 400,000 pounds of coins to a foundry designated by the U.S. On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed on the key implied contract claim. Mint in exchange for payment.

article thumbnail

Remixing and Remastering Music in US Copyright Law: Some Reflections after Arty v Marshmello

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Gutierrez held that Arty had contractually given up ownership of the rights over remix composition, and therefore had no grounds to sue. Subsequently, Interscope and Arty’s company, Telma Music LLC, entered into a contract (the ‘Remixer Declaration’) in September 2014. A 2018 decision from the 9 th Circuit, i.e. ABS v.

Music 98
article thumbnail

Implications and Takeaways from Delhi High Court’s Order in RDB and Co HUF v. Harper Collins Publishers

SpicyIP

Harper Collins ], the Delhi High Court dealt with the vexed issue of copyright ownership in a component of a cinematographic film, namely a screenplay. Roughly in 2018, Mr. Bhaskar Chattopadhyay novelized the screenplay of Nayak. The defendant, Harper Collins, published the novel on 5 th May, 2018. Second, as per S.

article thumbnail

Spider-Man: Where is Home?

IPilogue

However, Marvel had no right to unilaterally retain Spider-Man’s copyright unless Sony decided to terminate the contract—which seemed unlikely to happen. In 2015, Marvel and Sony made an unprecedented deal that the two companies would share joint-ownership in Spider-Man’s copyright. The film received praise from critics.

Contracts 105
article thumbnail

Delhi High Court clears the air around Copyright of Satyajit Ray’s ‘Nayak’

SpicyIP

The Controversy around the Ownership Upon being commissioned by the film’s producer, R. Around 50 years later, Bhaskar Chattopadhyay novelised its original screenplay, which was published on 5th May 2018 by HarperCollins Publishers India Pvt. So, would this mean that the plaintiff does not have any rights in the film Nayak?

Copyright 105