2018 Artistic Work Copying 
IP and Legal Filings
SEPTEMBER 17, 2021
Fashion designers and artists showcase their creative genius through conceptual fashion shows and apparel collections. In India, as of 2018, the industry was valued at over five trillion INR and is expected to reach about 223 billion dollars by 2021. As of 2019, the apparel market was valued at about 368 billion U.S dollars in the USA.
IIPRD
MARCH 4, 2024
This is basically for literary and artistic work. It was decided by the Supreme Court in the case that the cinematographic films do have the copy right it was on of the issue in the case of Yash Raj Films vs Sri Sri Ganesh Productions. [1] There is a Copyright Act, 1957 which deals with copyright in India. 2] Novartis v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Whiteboard
AUGUST 30, 2020
In what we understand to be an industry-first, the Copyright Agency (an Australian not-for-profit collecting society that also licences copyright protected literary and artistic works) has licenced an Indigenous artwork for a tattoo. Left: Chris Black’s Jarrangini (buffalo), 2018 © Chris Black/Copyright Agency, 2020.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 1, 2022
Flora-Bama logo The Flora-Bama has been featured in artistic works by third parties. Deliberate copying was irrelevant. In a Rogers case, intentional copying alone cannot justify an inference of copying with intent to confuse, even if that can occur in cases that don’t “implicate” the First Amendment. “[I]n
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 6, 2023
Acko General Insurance , the Delhi High Court is faced with the opportunity to elaborate whether and how street art in general is subject to the Copyright Act, the scope of ‘artistic work’ under Sec. 52(1)(t) and ‘moral rights’ of the author in such work. 13(1) of being ‘original artistic work’. 57 of the Act.
IIPRD
MARCH 1, 2023
In India, this right is protected under section 53A of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) which elucidates that artists and their heirs, upon the reselling of their original artwork by the owner, would be entitled to resale share rights in the original copies and manuscripts. Artists Rights Directive.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 15, 2023
The Claimant launched its dining table in 2018 as part of its ‘Palais Royal’ furniture collection, which also won numerous awards. Background Both the Claimant and Respondent sold dining tables. The Respondent submitted that the Palais Royal dining table would not be protected by copyright since it is not sufficiently original.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
94 
Let's personalize your content