2017 Derivative Work Moral Rights 
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2024
Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work. In 2017, the Regional Court of Bucharest held that the defendants had infringed the professor’s moral right of attribution. Despite (or rather because of ?) Indeed, in Institutul G. The decision was upheld on appeal.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Like most copyright systems, French copyright law does not leave much room for the freedom of authors of transformative graphic works (also called “derivative works”). Three interesting cases on derivative works, two involving Jeff Koons and one Tintin, have recently put French copyright law in the international spotlight (e.g.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
The personality rights in India are generally enforced in the context of Intellectual Property Laws. Using someone else’s identity without their consent violates both their personality rights as well as their right to privacy. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1. [3] Ammini Amma and Ors., 1] Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf v.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W. Zywicki & Thomas J. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] vii] Deidrè A. 511, 523 (2012). viii] See, e.g., Lee J.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
137 
Let's personalize your content