2017 Contracts Moral Rights 
The IPKat
JANUARY 21, 2022
Recognising the challenges for performers in the position and enforcement of their rights, the book also includes discussion on other forms of protections and remedies for performers, such as moral rights, contracts, passing off and copyright infringement.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. In 2017, the BGH once more issued a ruling on Section 95a UrhG in relation to the Nintendo DS games console. The BGH considered a licence fee in the amount of 100 Euro to be appropriate to cover the objective value of the right of use.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
AUGUST 15, 2023
Dua Lipa and Warner Music are being sued by talk box inventor and singer, Bosko Kante, for breach of contract and copyright infringement in hit song 'Levitating'. It it is, therefore, likely that the copyright infringement claim would effectively follow the breach of contract claim. Secondly, in New York, from L.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,
IIPRD
JANUARY 29, 2023
However, the conversation being considered as a contract between them was unclear regarding the IP rights. The creator was vague in terms of rights that they will keep in terms of moral rights or was it an implied license as terms were not clearly stated though there was a transaction. 6] Stuart D. 2d 119 (2d Cir.
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 26, 2023
The FIR accused YRF of committing a criminal breach of trust (CBT) and violating the Copyright Act by misappropriating 100 crores in royalties that belonged to members of the Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS). As per section 18(1), the author, not the copyright holder, is entitled to receive royalties. 106A [3] Marley C.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
129 
Let's personalize your content