2017 Confidentiality Marketing Settlement 
The IPKat
MAY 12, 2024
The UPCKat trying to keep confidential information confidential in the UPC As part of our UPCKat reporting on the latest UPC developments, the IPKat brings readers a roundup of how the UPC is treating confidentiality and third party access to court documents.
Trading Secrets
FEBRUARY 5, 2024
In 2017, Life Spine entered into various agreements with Aegis by which Aegis would sell and distribute ProLift devices while maintaining as confidential all proprietary information related to the devices. The ProLift is used to alleviate nerve pain and improve spinal alignment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 5, 2024
In 2017, Life Spine entered into various agreements with Aegis by which Aegis would sell and distribute ProLift devices while maintaining as confidential all proprietary information related to the devices. The ProLift is used to alleviate nerve pain and improve spinal alignment.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 8, 2024
We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] CV H-17-1068, 2017 WL 2957912, at *8 (S.D. July 11, 2017) (holding that “the mere purchase of AdWords alone, without directing a consumer to a potentially confusing web page, is not sufficient for a claim of trademark infringement,” citing Mary Kay, 601 F. ” Say what?
JIPL Online
MARCH 15, 2021
Then, the post will predict how Netflix may shift its content practices, defense strategies, and settlement tactics as a result of their past litigation successes in copyright actions. SETTLEMENT CASES. 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] TRIAL CASES.
The IPKat
JUNE 22, 2023
Mellor J, the Judge, explained that in very general terms he adopted the same approach as that of Birss J in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat) ([42]). The Judge decided to adopt the same approach as in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat) and in the US judgment TCL v Ericsson (C.D. 21, 2017) (Selna, J.)
The IPKat
DECEMBER 22, 2022
First, the high-quality judgments from the English Patents Court may help the parties negotiate a wider settlement. In the first case, Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat) , the effect of the declaration on preliminary injunctions abroad was one, but not the only reason for which Henry Carr J concluded that it would serve a useful purpose.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
61 
Let's personalize your content