This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Activision Investigation Has Been Running Since 2017. According to new filings with the court, Activision’s investigation into EngineOwning has been live since 2017. In 2017 and 2018, its lawyers wrote to them several times, demanding that they cease and desist. And that wasn’t all. domains.
Case Citation : Digital Marketing Advisors v. Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. The post 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. MGA Entertainment.
Highlights of the Week Don’t Offend My Oats: Generic Disparagement, Market Leadership, and Marico Limited vs. Alpino Health Foods Recently, the DHC passed an order prima facie finding that Marico’s “Saffola oats” TM was “generically disparaged” by Alpino’s advertisements. Anything we are missing out on?
The General Court then went on to consider that the use of an earlier right by a third party on the internal market, at the time of application for registration of a mark, is not an absolute condition in order to rely on bad faith ( Koton Ma?azacilik azacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C?
From a standing start in 2017, the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment is now the largest and most successful anti-piracy coalition on the planet. Two years on from these operations, ACE executed a successful cease and desist action near Belgrade, Serbia. ACE Has Experience in Key Areas.
” In May 2017, LinkedIn sent hiQ a C&D and blocked its IP addresses. In August 2017, the district court: found that hiQ showed a likelihood of irreparable harm, crediting hiQ’s assertion that the survival of its business was threatened absent a preliminary injunction. hiQ sought relief from the courts.
“For example, Defendants Rays IPTV LLC and Daud market the Infringing Service to the public by promising ‘No More Expensive Cable Bills,’ and targeting consumers ‘tired of paying too many bills for too little channels.’” a company doing business at an address in Jackson Heights, New York. .
Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Chen appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Spoiler: Not Well). * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v. MGA Entertainment.
” Market Effect. Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. The post Satirical Depiction in YouTube Video Gets Rough Treatment in Court appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
LinkedIn lawsuit started in 2017. CFAA : The key question is whether hiQ’s continued access following receipt of LinkedIn’s cease-and-desist letter was “without authorization” under the CFAA. Are robots.txt, IP address blocks, or cease-and-desist letters still relevant to the CFAA at all?
Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Babybus appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Spoiler: Not Well). * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v. MGA Entertainment.
Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Day to Day Imports appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Spoiler: Not Well). * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v. MGA Entertainment.
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. UMG appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Ripps appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Benjamin. * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. RIAA appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Spoiler: Not Well). * Another Section 512(f) Case Fails–ISE v. MGA Entertainment.
In 2017, the BGH once more issued a ruling on Section 95a UrhG in relation to the Nintendo DS games console. Injunctive relief (Section 97(1) UrhG) and cease and desist agreements. A decision in 2017 concerned a claim for information under Section 101(9) UrhG, specifically information with the use of traffic data.
So this post is 100% true, even if it might sound farcical. * * * This ruling is part of an ongoing multi-iteration tussle (in and out of court) over market share between two rival unions. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Maritas appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the DefenseDigital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isnt Covered by 17 USC 512(f)Red Rock v. Next Level Apps appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Next, from the early 2000s until 2017, the primary legal theory that was used to deter web scraping was the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or the CFAA. And then, in 2017, the famous hiQ Labs, Inc. The post Web Scraping for Me, But Not for Thee (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. LinkedIn Corp.
In making this finding I draw an adverse inference from Defendant’s failure to initiate litigation against Plaintiff…by November 19, 2018, Defendant was using the DMCA Takedown Notices to suppress a market competitor rather than to enforce a legitimate good faith claim of copyright infringement. MGA Entertainment.
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Zoox appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Barrett Financial appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Few opponents prefer to jump straight into court action, with oppositions typically the preference when a cease and desist letter fails to get the right reaction. The claimant was owner of VAGISIL, a long-established product on the UK market since 1984. I am pleased to say this isn’t one of them.
Often a party that challenges a term as generic will base its entitlement on the fact that it is engaged in marketing goods or services that are the same or similar to those of the other party. In November 2016, Respondent sent a cease-and-desist letter to Petitioner, demanding transfer of the domain name to Respondent.
5] This represents a missed opportunity—and potentially a market inefficiency—for companies looking to enforce trade secrets that have been misappropriated abroad. the ITC can also issue cease and desist orders to prevent further sales of the accused products. 2d 1325, 1327, 2017 WL 6327551, at *3 (E.D. 11, 2017). [8]
Regardless, it sent a cease and desist to the defendants in 2022 who have a shop in Jaipur with a similar name and have registered the word mark in 2013. When, therefore, another identical vanilla cream filled chocolate sandwich cookie enters the market, named ―FAB!O‖
The plaintiff had received a cease-and-desist letter from two German comedians who claimed that the copyright to this phrase belonged to them as they had come up with it during their shows. The plaintiff was thus allowed to proceed with the marketing of the T-shirts.
This expanding impact of Big Tech within and outside the market has regulators increasingly concerned about economic problems, prevention of competition, data privacy issues, media domination as well as political concerns, and even the democratic process itself. Demystification of Shri Sonam Sharma v Apple Inc. &
Temu entered the US market in September 2022. Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the DefenseDigital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isnt Covered by 17 USC 512(f)Red Rock v.
015736622 , registered in 2017 inter alia for ‘vodka’. As a result, Kefla was ordered to cease and desist from using its German trade mark and to agree to surrender it. There was also no indication of a marketing strategy which focused on the bottle shape. Background Globefill owns EU trade mark no. 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR ).
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the DefenseDigital Marketing v. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isnt Covered by 17 USC 512(f)Red Rock v. Another 512(f) Claim FailsBored Ape Yacht Club v.
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. Tam ” (2018), and my guest post on Eric Goldman’s Technology and Marketing Law Blog written after the Federal Circuit’s decision in In re Elster.) Elster (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content