2017 Artistic Work Copying Copyright Infringement 
IP and Legal Filings
AUGUST 14, 2023
SHOULD LEX LOCI PROTECTIONIS BE APPLIED BLANKETLY TO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT? It has been established that lex loci protectionis is the rule that is applied to all the IPR infringement cases, barring a few exceptions. Today, most of the copyright infringement happen through the Internet. Which law to choose then?
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 12, 2023
This issue was cleared in Civic Chandran case wherein the Court held that ‘the purpose of reproduction of artistic work i.e., counter drama was not misappropriation, to produce a play similar to the original. The Supreme Court’s decisions in the case of Shree Ventakesh Films (SVF) v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2024
As a result, his estate launched proceedings for copyright infringement. In 2017, the Regional Court of Bucharest held that the defendants had infringed the professor’s moral right of attribution. The decision was upheld on appeal. Dan Slușanschi A further appeal to the High Court of Cassation and Justice followed.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
The status of the right to privacy as a fundamental right was established with the Puttaswamy judgment in the year 2017 [2] , due to which the development of the right to publicity as an aspect of the right to privacy in India is at the nascent stage. It usually entails review, commentary, satire, comedy, criticism over the original work.
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 20, 2023
Introduction Any literally or artistic work that is original and creative i.e.; not copied from anywhere by the owner is protected under Copyright Act, 1957. Therefore, AI may not equipped for generating an original work. Saudi Arabia has allowed citizenship to an AI humanoid robot, Sophia in 2017.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
Upon first learning of the Prince Series after Prince’s death—when she noticed the Condé Nast magazine cover—Goldsmith notified the Warhol Foundation that she considered the magazine’s use of the Prince Series image to violate her copyright in the Prince Photograph. Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work. 103(a) (“protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.”).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content