Remove 2016 Remove Fair Use Remove Licensing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

No Free Use in the Purple Rain – U.S. Supreme Court Finds License of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Infringes Photographer’s Copyright

LexBlog IP

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. scholarship, or research” [2] and is evaluated through multiple factors.

article thumbnail

Andy Warhol, Prince, and the First Amendment: U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review of Questions Concerning “Fair Use” Under Copyright Act

LexBlog IP

Supreme Court recently granted a petition for writ of certiorari (docket, here ) to review the extent to which a work of art is a “transformative” fair use under the Copyright Act. Vanity Fair licensed one of Goldsmith’s Prince photographs to use in a Vanity Fair article.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Copyright Clash Of Shark Tank India : Balancing Startup Promotions And IP Protection

Intepat

The show’s stance is that in the absence of permission from the copyright holder (Culver Max Entertainment), the use of video clips or footage from Shark Tank India by participating startups constitutes copyright infringement. The dispute highlights the need for clear guidelines and licensing between reality shows and participants.

article thumbnail

The Modern Copyright Dilemma: Digital Content Ownership and Access

IP and Legal Filings

The crux of this debate is the argument that if the theft of restricted digital content is for the purpose of knowledge and research, it should be considered as an act done under ‘fair use’ and ‘fair dealing’ of the content. Digital Rights Management & Fair Use If everything is so well designed, then where is the issue?

article thumbnail

WIPIP Concurrent Session #3: Copyright Doctrine

43(B)log

In 1963, Disney expressed skepticism about monopoly aspects of extended term and “expressed doubt that Congress would approve a longer ownership period.” Hughes: it was the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, not the DMCA, which was intertwined. Zahr Said, Shotgun Damages in Copyright Multipliers used to ratchet up damages.

article thumbnail

“Right to Access a Public Record” vs “Right to not Communicate the Work”: Where is Public Interest?”

SpicyIP

Degrees), Regulations, 2016 and the UGC Act, 1956 which have mandatory application on the Universities. Degrees) Regulations, 2016 which mandates the submission of an electronic copy of the Ph. JMI’s research policy, IPR Policy, and ordinance are silent on the ownership of Copyright in the thesis. Fair Use and Public Interest.

article thumbnail

New Tools, Old Rules: Is The Music Industry Ready To Take On AI?

Copyright Lately

Companies have to obtain permission and execute a license to use copyrighted content for AI training or other purposes, and we’re committed to maintaining these legal principles.” By the way, I purposely used the names of individuals in my example to make a point. We own all sounds captured on a sound recording.

Music 84