TorrentFreak

MAY 17, 2022

It is unlikely that these features will appear on a licensed mainstream service but that doesn’t stop subscribers from desiring them. for a ‘lifetime’ license. You agree that as a condition of your license, you will not: i. People Want to Download and Keep Movies & TV Shows.

Copying 145

Copying Social Media Licensing Technology 145

Velocity of Content

AUGUST 9, 2022

Vanity Fair (magazine) took a license to use and modify the image for its magazine and hired Warhol to use his artistic talents to develop a new image. Goldsmith realized what had happened—that Warhol had made over a dozen works based on her photograph, the majority of which had not been licensed.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Licensing Derivative Work Art 98

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2022

Vanity Fair contacted Lynn Goldsmith’s licensing agency in search of a photograph of that performer to serve as an artist reference. The agency granted Vanity Fair a license to use a Goldsmith photograph of Prince for this purpose on a one-time-only basis. Besides, Goldsmith had chosen not to license that photograph to others.

Fair Use 100

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 100

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. scholarship, or research” [2] and is evaluated through multiple factors.

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Unbeknownst to Ms. Goldsmith, Andy Warhol not only used Ms.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. Damle introductory statement, Tr.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 105

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

A few years later, in 1984, Goldsmith’s agency, which had retained the rights to those images, licensed one of them to Vanity Fair for use in an article called “Purple Fame.” In 1981, Goldsmith, who was then a portrait photographer for Newsweek , took a series of photographs of the then-up-and-coming musician Prince. He did just that.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. ” Goldsmith’s photograph was then licensed to Vanity Fair in 1984 for $400 as a “one time” “artist reference for an illustration.”

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Derivative Work Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 18, 2023

Goldsmith had issued a limited license for this purpose. The license stated her photograph could be used for reference, “one time only.” ” Turns out – in addition to the Vanity Fair illustration – Warhol made a series of 16 additional works derived from Goldsmith’s photo.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Copyright 52

Copyright Lately

AUGUST 14, 2023

.” Focusing on the tattoo itself, defendants argue that “[t]he specific challenged use—a non-commercial tattoo hand-inked on the arm of Kat Von D’s friend—is nothing like the copyrighted use, a photograph licensed to be used in a magazine article about Miles Davis.”

Fair Use 93

Fair Use Social Media Licensing Marketing 93

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

2] The Court’s decision affirmed the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the Warhol work was derivative of the original, and noted that “the new expression may be relevant to whether a copying use has a sufficiently distinct purpose or character” but that factor was not dispositive by itself. [3]

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 26, 2023

2] The Court’s decision affirmed the ruling of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the Warhol work was derivative of the original, and noted that “the new expression may be relevant to whether a copying use has a sufficiently distinct purpose or character” but that factor was not dispositive by itself. [3]

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 52

Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

In a 7-2 decision , the Court ruled that the commercial licensing of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” to Condé Nast to illustrate a story about the late musician shared “substantially the same purpose” as the original Lynn Goldsmith photo from which Warhol’s silkscreen was derived, and therefore weighed against fair use. Goldsmith.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 98

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. ” Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 5, 2023

The case began after Prince died in 2016, when Vanity Fair magazine’s parent company, Condé Nast, published a special commemorative magazine celebrating his life. ” The license provided that the use would be for “one time” only. .” Syllabus) at 4. ” Slip Op.,

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In 1984, Condé Nast, the publisher, obtained a license from Goldsmith to allow Andy Warhol to use her Prince portrait as the foundation for a single serigraphy to be featured in Vanity Fair magazine. In 2016, Condé Nast acquired a license from the Warhol Foundation to use the Prince Series as illustrations for a new magazine.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

The first factor did not apply to Warhol’s image as published in Condé Nast in 2016, so that specific use was not fair use. ” Thus, being licensed for different magazine articles, “the original photograph and AWF’s copying use of it share substantially the same purpose. of a commercial nature.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Copyright Infringement 40

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

[x] In fact, on the contrary, memes can operate as a source of marketing and a way to garner interest in creative works in a funny, generationally relevant way. xviii] In one instance, Getty Images pursued a German blog—Geek Sisters—for almost $900 in licensing fees for their use of the awkward penguin meme. Stearns, Todd J.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

.” In 2004, video game publisher Capcom contacted MKR, the film’s producer, to inquire about about obtaining a license to use elements from the film in one of its games. In 1999, Cinema Secrets licensed the right to sell a Michael Myers Halloween mask from the film’s copyright owner. ROMERO’S DAWN OF THE DEAD.

Copyright 145

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 145

JIPL Online

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

Mods are beneficial for the video game industry, [3] but mods can threaten a company’s copyright exclusivity because of their status as derivative works. [4] Section 106 of the Copyright Act grants copyright holders an exclusive right to make or license derivative works based upon a previously copyrighted work. [11]

Derivative Work 59

Derivative Work Cease and Desist Blogging Litigation 59

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

Companies have to obtain permission and execute a license to use copyrighted content for AI training or other purposes, and we’re committed to maintaining these legal principles.” Note that Chrissy would still need to obtain a license to use the underlying “Best Day Ever” composition.) Ciccone , 824 F.3d

Music 93

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 93

LexBlog IP

MAY 31, 2023

The decision was limited to AWF’s commercial licensing of a silkscreen image of Prince, based on Goldsmith’s underlying photograph, to Condé Nast. Goldsmith later granted a limited, “one time” license to Vanity Fair in 1984 for the magazine to use the photograph as an artist reference.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Copyright Editing 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ holding that the Andy Warhol Foundation’s licensing of Warhol’s Orange Prince , a print based on a photograph of the late musician by defendant Lynn Goldsmith, did not constitute fair use of the Goldsmith photograph. [3] Many derivative works.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. ” (S. ” Id.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 1, 2023

In 2016, Time “embedded” one of Brauer’s Instagram posts, featuring one of his photos of Hilary Clinton, in its entirety (preserving his username or “handle”, his caption, and his links and hashtags). How are photographers supposed to get the attention of those publishers without displaying samples of their work?

Blogging 98

Blogging Copying Social Media Copyright 98

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2023

Hughes: it was the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, not the DMCA, which was intertwined. Before 2016, appeared to be that these multipliers were impermissible punitive damages. In 2016, Leonard v. Lemley: Patent law uses the actual license amount; there’s no reason to use a multiplier when we actually know.

Copyright 45

Copyright Copying Music Fair Use 45

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. Damle introductory statement, Tr.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Art Music 40

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 2, 2024

Goldsmith SCOTUS understood the “use” to be the foundation’s commercial licensing. But licensing is neither a © use nor an act of infringement. Licensing is not found in 106. Sotomayor says, 8 times, that the use at issue is commercial licensing. A license is a grant of permission to use, not a use in itself.

Fair Use 49

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Marketing 49

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The lawsuit involves sound recordings of 19 interviews that then-President Trump voluntarily gave to Woodward between December 2019 and August 2020, plus one interview from 2016 (when Trump was still a candidate). The Falwell court was on solid ground in denying relief on the grounds of an implied license. complaint filed Jan.

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

The audiobook, The Trump Tapes , is comprised of 20 audio interviews, one with Trump during his presidential campaign in 2016 and the remaining 19 from the interviews conducted during his term as president. According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution.

Copyright 98

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 98

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

The audiobook, The Trump Tapes , is comprised of 20 audio interviews, one with Trump during his presidential campaign in 2016 and the remaining 19 from the interviews conducted during his term as president. According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution.

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 52