article thumbnail

Today in Patent Law Class: Markman v. Westview Instruments

Patently-O

Today in Patent Law Class, we covered the Supreme Court’s important decision in Markman v. 370 (1996) focusing on the question of whether the patentee has a 7th Amendment right to have a jury decide “genuine factual disputes about the meaning of a patent?” by Dennis Crouch. Westview Instruments, Inc.,

article thumbnail

“Asexual Reproduction Prohibited”? Plant Propagation and Patent Law

IPilogue

In Canada, protection of plant varieties and plant breeders’ rights (“PBRs”) fall under the scope of the Plant Breeders’ Rights Act of 1990 , which was revised in 2015 to adopt the widely recognized International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (“UPOV”) standards.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

The Kessler Doctrine : If you want to really dig into this case, please read my article on the topic that I wrote for an Akron Law review IP symposium issue. Dennis Crouch & Homayoon Rafatijo, Resorbing Patent Law’s Kessler Cat into the General Law of Preclusion , 54 Akron Law Ref. 2022)(forthcoming).

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Tidbit: Book on Patent Law by DHC Justice Prathiba M Singh Launched

SpicyIP

Having started back in 2015 , Delhi High Court judge Justice Prathiba M. Singh’s book on Patent Law is finally out. Also, the book discusses the challenges of AI in patent law, debating the protection of AI-created innovations amid their rapid growth (chapter 20).

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Rejects Patent Misuse Defense in Minimum Royalty Dispute, Setting Up Potential Supreme Court Review

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The vast majority of patent appeals are heard by the U.S. patent laws. However, patent-related issues occasionally arise in contexts outside the Federal Circuits jurisdiction, notably in breach-of-license disputes involving patent misuse. 446 (2015). Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Patent 40
article thumbnail

EPO consults on patent grace periods (again)

The IPKat

The availability of the grace period in the US also provides the advantage that the patentability of an invention is not immediately destroyed by an unintentional disclosure or prior use by an inventor unfamiliar with the patent law ( IPKat ).

Patent 132
article thumbnail

Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week!

The IPKat

This appeal was directed against the judgment of 13 March 2015 by Mr Justice Singh where he notably held that Ericsson had prima facie complied with its FRAND commitment, and that Intex was prima facie unwilling to execute a FRAND licence.

IP 69