2015 Marketing Moral Rights 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. In 2015, the BGH ruled that managing directors have limited liability in copyright matters.
U.S. Department of Commerce
SEPTEMBER 8, 2023
We firmly believe that diversity and inclusion are not just morally right but also strategically smart. Businesses that prioritize diversity within their leadership ranks are better positioned to adapt to rapidly changing markets, leverage a wider range of perspectives, and capitalize on new opportunities. customer base. [6]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
x] In fact, on the contrary, memes can operate as a source of marketing and a way to garner interest in creative works in a funny, generationally relevant way. xi] There are countless articles and marketing studies directing corporations on how to market via memes to reach the maximum level of engagement. 8, 2015), [link].
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
Certain sections like 2(qq) and 38, define a “performer” and specify whether a person’s personality falls under the definition of a performer, under which a performer’s right may be asserted, hence prohibiting the unapproved marketing of a performer’s work. Varsha Productions, 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 158. [7]
Velocity of Content
DECEMBER 4, 2024
1 Another key right is the creation of derivative works, which includes adaptations or translations. 3 This action would violate the right to translate, which is a specific aspect of the broader right to create derivative works. 2012); Paul Goldstein , Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright , 30 J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Moulinsart, the Belgian company that holds the rights to Tintin, and the heir of the author, Hergé, holder of the moral rights, brought a copyright infringement case against Marabout. Since the 2015 judgment, the freedom of expression defence has been used in many copyright cases. The parody defence.
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 6, 2024
The Court held that there was violation of the plaintiff’s personality/publicity rights as well as moral rights in his performances. Accordingly, the Court held that the plaintiff did not contravene section 12A(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Ratan Malkani v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content