article thumbnail

AI and Fair Use: Navigating Legal Challenges in India and the United States

IIPRD

One such legal issues is what is referred to as “fair use,” which becomes particularly problematic in the context of the copyright law. Thus, fundamental questions arise, such as whether such copying amounts to infringement under copyright law or whether it falls under the purview of fair use. Google, Inc.

article thumbnail

How Fair Use Favors OpenAI in the ANI Lawsuit

IP and Legal Filings

Fair Use is one of the principles being mooted in defense of OpenAI to argue that the latters Use of the formers copyrighted content fits within Fair Use thresholds and is, thereby, justifiable. 2015), also known as the Google Books Case. [2] Google, Inc., 3d 202, 229 (2d.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Richard Prince Effectively Settles, Dodging Post-Warhol Fair Use Ruling

IP Watchdog

On Thursday, final judgments were issued in a pair of copyright infringement cases that arose from a now infamous 2014/2015 project New Portraits, where appropriations artist Richard Prince displayed Instagram photos and user comments as a purported commentary on social media and art.

Fair Use 110
article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex:Product disparagement or nominative fair use?

IP and Legal Filings

Nominative fair use of a trademark is a legal doctrine that can be used as a defence in some types of trademark infringement cases. Following are the measures to be taken care of while taking nominative fair use as a defence – The use of the registered trade mark was bonfide. No sponsorship or endorsement.

article thumbnail

Fair Use for Documentaries in US Copyright Law: Brown v Netflix

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).

Fair Use 105
article thumbnail

Copyright Laws and Fair Dealing: Analysing the Ongoing Dispute Between Dhanush And Nayanthara

IP and Legal Filings

Furthermore, A legal notice had been issued to Nayanthara by Dhanush prior to the usage of the clip, stating the consequence of using the BTS would be a ten-crore lawsuit, which Nayanthara openly neglected by incorporating the said footage in the trailer of the documentary. Narsimhasn, 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 364 [2] Kamble Sayabanna Kallappa v.

article thumbnail

Tattoos and Copyright: A Potent Combination

Plagiarism Today

Implied License – Second, Take-Two could have argued that, by placing the tattoo on Randy Orton, that Alexander granted an implied license for it to be used as part of his image, including on TV, film and video games. While these would be three defenses that Take-Two could claim, the jury only got the chance to weigh one, fair use.

Copyright 246