2015 Copyright Infringement Derivative Work 
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2024
Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work. In 2015, the Romanian Academy/National Foundation for Science and Art, published a book that allegedly incorporated Slușanschi’s critical edition. As a result, his estate launched proceedings for copyright infringement.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
Like most copyright systems, French copyright law does not leave much room for the freedom of authors of transformative graphic works (also called “derivative works”). Derivative works under French copyright law. A composite work is therefore a derivative work, i.e. simple incorporations (e.g.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPL Online
MARCH 15, 2021
With more content comes the increased possibility that Netflix is engaging in copyright infringement and on the receiving end of copyright infringement claims. [1] 1] This blog will briefly summarize a few of the notable copyright infringement cases Netflix has defended against in the United States.
IP and Legal Filings
DECEMBER 23, 2024
2015), also known as the Google Books Case. [2] 2] [3] NATURE OF COPYRIGHTED WORK FULFILLS SECOND FACTOR REQUIREMENT As a corollary of the general rule of Protection of Expression over Protection of ideas per-se, the second factor prioritizes unpublished works over published works in granting a narrow approach to the Fair Use Doctrine.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
In particular, it explores why copyright of a meme’s underlying content does not matter in a normative sense. In this blog I argue that copyright protection of the content underlying memes does not matter because of the relative weakness of enforcement mechanisms for copyright infringement of this scale. 8, 2015), [link].
The IPKat
JULY 7, 2024
Xavier Marabout, a parodist painter, produced a series of works depicting the character of Tintin in situations inspired by the world of the American painter Hopper. In 2015, Moulinsart and Hergé's widow sued Marabout before the TGI of Rennes for copyright infringement and parasitism. 113-4 of CPI.
Patently-O
DECEMBER 11, 2023
45, to bring enforcement actions aimed at activities, including those involving the training and use of AI, that might involve copyright infringement—although we would note that the copyright consequences of AI are, as yet, undefined. That is far too hasty. Under governing law, that is a judicial function. Vanderhye v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
137 
Let's personalize your content