Remove 2015 Remove Copying Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Google Accuses Regulators of Plagiarism

Plagiarism Today

billion) fine over allegations that the company abused its ownership of the Android mobile operating system to unlawfully push its other products. According to Google, there were at least 50 instances of copying, some of which were “word-for-word”. Copy and Paste Roundup. billion-euro ($4.3

article thumbnail

Traditional Tattoos on the Red Carpet: Continuing the Conversation of Collective Ownership

IPilogue

These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws. Of note, in DRG Inc.

Ownership 102
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Protecting Semiconductor Chip Design under the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 (SCPA) – Part I (Registration and Inspection)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

The SCPA legally protects layouts of integrated circuits upon registration, making them illegal to copy without permission. The deposit can be either a physical copy of the mask work or a digital copy in a format specified by the Office. It is authorized by the federal Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 (SCPA).

article thumbnail

Trade Dress Protection for Non-Traditional Marks in the Fashion Industry

IP and Legal Filings

In fact, if a competitor merely copies a distinctive design like Louis Vuitton’s handbag pattern to make consumers believe that a particular product is coming from them, this gives a potential for confusion. 7] Tiffany & Co v Costco Wholesale Corp (2015) US District Court for the Southern District of New York. [8]

article thumbnail

Why Bots Shouldn’t Decide Copyright Cases

Plagiarism Today

Sheeran’s attorneys argued the elements that were allegedly copied, namely a chord progression and the harmonic rhythm, were both commonplace in music and not protectable by copyright. Much of the uptick began after the March 2015 Blurred Lines ruling , where the estate of Marvin Gaye won a $7.3 Songwriting and Litigation.

Copyright 290
article thumbnail

17 Copyright and/or Plagiarism Stories for Halloween

Plagiarism Today

Nearly all copies of the film were destroyed, but an American copy survived, as Dracula was already public domain in the United States. At the time, it was facing accusations that it was as plagiarism of a 2015 short student film. In short, the estate of Bram Stoker sued the filmmakers behind Nosferatu and won.

article thumbnail

Tattoos and Copyright: A Potent Combination

Plagiarism Today

However, the important thing to know is that there was no doubt that Take-Two did copy the tattoos in question and there was no question of Alexander’s ownership of them. Alexander had sought $2 for every copy of WWE 2K sold, an amount that would have equaled roughly $20 million. Blurred Tattoo Lines.

Copyright 246