Remove 2015 Remove Copying Remove Derivative Work
article thumbnail

When is a derivative work original and thus protectable by copyright? Classicist’s critical edition makes its way to Luxembourg in fresh Romanian CJEU referral

The IPKat

Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work. In 2015, the Romanian Academy/National Foundation for Science and Art, published a book that allegedly incorporated Slușanschi’s critical edition. Despite (or rather because of ?) Indeed, in Institutul G. When the CJEU decides Institutul G.

article thumbnail

HIT NETFLIX CONTENT AND THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT THAT FOLLOWS

JIPL Online

The Conan Doyle estate, heirs to the author of the works about the famed detective Sherlock Holmes, alleged that Netflix infringed on the character Sherlock Holmes in its portrayal of Sherlock Holmes in the 2020 movie “Enola Holmes.” [2] 18] Netflix admitted it had access to and copied the memoir. [19]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Copyright Liability for LLM Outputs

Velocity of Content

If so, infringement may occur unless an exception applies or the LLM did not have access to the original work. 1 Another key right is the creation of derivative works, which includes adaptations or translations. 7 This does not, however, fully answer hard questions about the right to prepare derivative works under US law.

article thumbnail

The FTC’s Misguided Comments on Copyright Office Generative AI Questions

Patently-O

so-called “non-expressive” use in which copying is undertaken not to distribute the copied material directly or indirectly but rather for some other purpose. The FTC Comments do not explicitly refer to or analyze the substantial body of court decisions holding that a range of non-expressive uses of copyrighted works are fair uses.

article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W. 405 (2019); Terrica Carrington, Grumpy Cat or Copy Cat? 8, 2015), [link]. [vii] Deidrè A. 511, 523 (2012). viii] See, e.g., Lee J. Memetic Marketing in the Digital Age , 7 Geo. Minc Law (Sept. 21, 2021).

article thumbnail

The Interplay of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression- the Jackie Shroff’s Case’

IP and Legal Filings

the Hon’ble Kerala High Court upheld these conditions and further laid down three conditions: (i) The amount and value of the matter copied for the purposes of comment or criticism; (ii) The purpose behind taking the same; The likelihood of competition between the works. [11] Varsha Productions, 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 158. [7]

article thumbnail

What Goldsmith Means to AI Trainers

IP Intelligence

2015); Authors Guild, Inc. Challenges for Content Owners in AI Training No content owner will ever be able to demonstrate that it was their work, and their work alone, that enabled a usable AI model. Second, the number of copies/downloads/users/seat licenses model simply does not work in the AI training context.

Fair Use 105