This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See The court also found “Ms.
In 2015, FDN filed a DMCA takedown notice, but Amazon did not take down the work in question. Also in 2018, FDN filed the original complaint, targeting both Amazon and CCA, alleging that they both breached contracts and committed copyright infringement. The registration had hiccups and ended up taking around two years to process.
This dispute arises out of a 2015 transaction between the league and an entity formed to become the San Diego Gulls hockey team, which included the assignment of certain trademarks, including a logo, to the team. The league’s win resolves the league’s potential indemnity obligation to the hockey team, the Gulls. What’s missing here?
— Bright Data has long sold the data of all the major socialmedia companies. sued Bright Data for trespass to chattels, breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, and misappropriation. 2015) (emphasis added). on all counts.
In 2015, Austrian law student and privacy activist, Maximillian Schrems, sued Facebook Ireland for what he alleged to be an unlawful transfer of data from Facebook Ireland to Facebook’s headquarters in the United States. Compelled to revise his challenge in 2015, Schrems alleged that contractual arrangements in the U.S.
This dispute arises out of a 2015 transaction between the league and an entity formed to become the San Diego Gulls hockey team, which included the assignment of certain trademarks, including a logo, to the team. The league’s win resolves the league’s potential indemnity obligation to the hockey team, the Gulls.
In Nigeria, Airtel Nigeria Limited neglected to renew their contract with actor and filmmaker Adewole Ojo to use his photographs for advertisements. The photographer, Esther Umoh called this person out for copyright infringement on socialmedia platform “X”. Katpost on the ruling here.
August asserts that the Defendant, AirG Inc, a Canadian socialmedia brand, committed copyright infringement by reproducing six of Pugliese’s Jennifer Lopez photos on their website without permission. The Court was not satisfied that any of this evidence confirmed that Pugliese was a US citizen in April 2015, when photos were created.
Under the IPO’s proposal, “Rights holders will no longer be able to charge for UK licences for TDM and will not be able to contract or opt-out of the exception. The need remains for high quality, validated news unavailable from socialmedia. The music industry has already fired a shot about the new TDM exception.
26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. Defendants counterclaimed for payment and damages for breach of contract and bad faith. about your goods, products or services”).
Power Ventures was a platform that attempted to enable users to manage all their socialmedia accounts from one platform. 2015 WL 1289984 at 4 (N.D. March 20, 2015). Power Ventures was a 2016 case involving Facebook (back when the company itself was still known as Facebook). emphasis mine). Koninklijke Philips N.V.
David Adjmi was previously sued over his Three’s Company parody 3C , but in 2015 the court found the play protected by fair use. These contracts typically give producers access to interviews, personal materials, and behind-the-scenes stories, in addition to waivers for defamation and privacy claims.
And, as we previously blogged , the SEC historically had limited enforcement activity for Rule 21F-17(a), with roughly 14 enforcement actions between 2015 and 2021. However, Rule 21f-17(a) does not create a private right of action.
And, as we previously blogged , the SEC historically had limited enforcement activity for Rule 21F-17(a), with roughly 14 enforcement actions between 2015 and 2021. .” However, Rule 21f-17(a) does not create a private right of action.
On 12 th February 2021, Taylor Swift re-released one of her most famous songs “Love Story” the reason being as Swift told Good Morning America last August was, “My contract says that starting November 2020 … I can record albums one through five all over again.”. The Big Move. A master recording is the original recording of a piece of music.
The lawsuit states that De La Cruz’s “distinguishable voice” also has been used without her consent for songs, records, promotions, worldwide concerts, television, radio and social and musical platforms.
But then, starting in 2015, Travilyn began to serve copyright termination notices on over 50 of Jay’s most valuable compositions, including “Que Sera, Sera,” which became effective in 2019. In the meantime, let me know if you have any comments or questions below, or @copyrightlately on socialmedia.
2, 2024) Some interesting comments on when individual instances of “confusion” don’t count, as well as their relevance to evaluating out-of-court socialmedia etc. The parties settled in 2015; defendants agreed to cease their use of those marks and to avoid the words “Florida” and “Virtual” together in a mark. “The
In 2015, a sales agent of Fairfox & Favor began discussions with House of Bruar to supply them with boots. After further design work on an elasticated panel (or gusset to expand and contract with the calf) with strips of leather/suede running down the back of the boot and adding of tassels, the design was finalized in November 2014.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on socialmedia. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on socialmedia. Radiance v NAACP, 1415-68 (4th Cir 2015).
delivered by a Michigan federal jury for the breach of its contract with Versata Software and the misappropriation of Versata’s trade secrets. Versata had been a vendor of Ford’s since the 1990’s until 2015 when Ford terminated the relationship. million for Ford’s breach of contract. The jury awarded $22.39
I didn’t use much socialmedia 20 years ago – and still only primarily use 1 (BlueSky) for personal. I follow (via social and blogs) more independent journalists than I did then – I may not have followed any journalists in 2004. I don’t remember when we abandoned that subscription…maybe 2015?
” [For more on the crisis of online contracts, see this short piece.] __ “I analyze everything you post and often apply those insights to my workespecially topics like Section 230 of the CDA, privacy issues, and e-commerce.” The fiction of mutual agreement is intriguing.”
First, governments can never successfully operate a socialmedia service. Of course, mobs, riots, rebellions, pogroms, lynchings, and other coordinated killings have taken place throughout human history, well before socialmedia existed. socialmedia has played an outsized role in finding and prosecuting the insurrection.
On the heels of the mandatory editorial transparency provisions in Florida and Texas’ socialmedia censorship laws, the California legislature thought it could one-up those states by passing a law with at least 161 different disclosure requirements. The opinion upheld every aspect of Texas’ socialmedia censorship law.
But MAGA got one thing right: some socialmedia owners would find the temptation to embrace partisanship irresistible. MAGA has also complained that the government improperly pressured socialmedia to make content moderation decisions (the so-called “censorship-industrial complex”). FOLLOW ME THERE!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content