This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In 2015, the National Music Publishers Association (NMPA) filed a lawsuit against Wolfgang’s Vault, alleging that the service did not have a license for the underlying compositions of the songs it streamed. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
The case was filed in the UK by Sami Chokri, who accuses Sheenan and his co-writers or infringing his 2015 song Oh Why. That was offered exclusively through a contract with LexisNexis. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
According to the lawsuit, Walkie Check CEO Joshua Lebowitz pitched the idea for House Party back in 2015. This prompted Walkie Check to sue for breach of an implied contract, unjust enrichment and copyright infringement. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. Capacity to be subject to legal action.
It has already entered into licensing agreements with several content creators, including other news media organizations.” Instead, they point to how much they have produced or licensed with the assumption that it is all scraped by OpenAI. The claims that are alleged will face some significant headwinds.
In 2015, FDN filed a DMCA takedown notice, but Amazon did not take down the work in question. Also in 2018, FDN filed the original complaint, targeting both Amazon and CCA, alleging that they both breached contracts and committed copyright infringement. The registration had hiccups and ended up taking around two years to process.
Recognising the challenges for performers in the position and enforcement of their rights, the book also includes discussion on other forms of protections and remedies for performers, such as moral rights, contracts, passing off and copyright infringement.
There is a lot going in this decision, but the crux of the appeal is a license interpretation question. Here are the rough facts: Hwang licensed its patent rights to Plastronics Socket. In the appeal, the Federal Circuit confirmed that the “divisive merger” cannot be used to escape from contract obligations.
What happens to a trademark license when the brand owner goes bankrupt? The Court will seek to resolve a split in circuits as to whether a debtor-licensor can terminate a trademark license agreement by “rejection,” thereby taking back the trademark rights it licensed and precluding a licensee from using the trademark.
In addition to significantly changing the Portuguese Copyright Code , the Decree-Law also affects Law 26/2015 on collective management organizations and Decree-Law 122/2000 on databases, and creates a new dispute resolution mechanism called “specialized institutionalized arbitration and mediation in matters of copyright and related rights”.
sued Bright Data for trespass to chattels, breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, and misappropriation. 2015) (emphasis added). Here, the court agreed, and dismissed Twitter’s breach-of-contract claims on that basis. on all counts.
In this 650-paragraph judgement , the court ruled that students can in certain situations be “consumers” vis a vis the university under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999/2083) (UTCCR). In Oct 2013, Mr. Jing commenced his DPhil studies (PhD equivalent), signing a contract which included the University’s IP Provisions.
The arbitrator’s decision itself is filed under seal, but the court recaps the arbitrator’s findings: Although the contracts between Plaintiff and Amazon concerning the purchase of the diet pills at issue were illegal and unenforceable, the CoU that governed the transactions were severable and remained enforceable. Trilegiant.
Typically, in the case of scholarly publications, authors are publicly funded through payment under a standing contract with a university or research institute, or through project funding, including EU funding. It is thus very much in line with the spirit of Title IV, arts. of the Directive. A new para 2 to art. On the other hand, art.
While academics and stakeholders have been critically dissecting its controversial provisions on platform liability, news aggregation and text & data mining, the Directive’s Chapter 3 (‘Fair remuneration in exploitation contracts of authors and performers’) has gone almost unnoticed, save for a positive opinion of the European Copyright Society.
On the other hand, it clearly distinguishes those with an economic copyright interest from those without one while setting forth two clear paths for reuse: licensing for the former, copyright exception for the latter. The options ranged from no change to UK law, to improving the licensing environment, to offering new copyright exceptions.
They also claimed that this new system goes against the traditional set-up of licensing practices in Europe and will lead to market fragmentation. Under these circumstances, the Constitutional Court seeks the following clarifications as to the compatibility of Art. 228/4 with EU law [unofficial translation by this Kat]: 4.
Southwest asserts claims under the CFAA, the Texas computer crime statute, breach of contract, and trademark. Southwest relied on its breach of contract claim when requesting an injunction. The court previously denied Kiwi’s motion to dismiss, without much discussion of the merits.
In 2013 and 2015, it granted exclusive licenses to stream those works to Starz, a premium subscription channel. The time periods for each license were separate, and some licenses were renewed multiple times, resulting in more than 1,000 separate license periods. 204(a) ).
According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) , “trade secrets are intellectual property rights on confidential information which may be sold or licensed.” In another scenario a party receiving confidential information would be obligated to keep information confidential even when there was or there was no existing contract.
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums. Knitting Fever, Inc.,
Then he reversed course on remand and ruled in favor of LinkedIn on its breach of contract claims. On January 23rd, Judge Chen once again dropped a bombshell for the web-scraping world (and those looking to stop it) by ruling in favor of Bright Data and against Meta on its breach of contract claims at summary judgment. Bright Data Ltd.
Concomitantly, the imposition of APCs has created new, and sometimes insurmountable, barriers to publication for researchers that are not affiliated to a contracting institution. [6] In current practice, authors are expected to assign or exclusively license their copyright to publishers. The trends towards paying to perform research”.
However, much of this power is effectuated contractually through end-user license agreements or applicable terms of service with individuals and tournament organizers. For instance, in 2015, a Twitch streaming channel named “SpectateFaker” was issued a takedown notice by Abuzu , another video game streaming service.
Background On 14 July 2015, 44IP Limited (’44IP’), which manages the IP rights of Sir Lewis Carl Davidson Hamilton MBE, filed EU trade mark application no. The application of this principle required Lewis Hamilton to be famous in the entire EU at the filing date of the contested application, i.e. on 14 July 2015.
Professor Paul Goldstein, for example, has argued that, in light of the enumeration, the statutory text is intended primarily to protect certain licensing markets. Another controversy that the production of literary and artistic material by LLMs elevates to a core issue is the originality controversy. United States v. Kaluza, 780 F.3d
Generally, a photographic syndication agency holds contractual agreements with various photographers to sell and license their photos for commercial and/or editorial use. in damages, which is the total license fee for the photos. The Plaintiff, August Image LLC (“August”) is a photographic syndication agency based in New York, USA.
in nominal damages for contract and trade secret claims against a former employee, citing the immateriality of defendant’s breach and plaintiff’s failure to prove a fair licensing price for its misappropriation damages. In February 2015, he resigned from his position with AirFacts. In AirFacts, Inc.
Case Study 2- Cristiano Ronaldo (6) In mid-June of 2015, Cristiano Ronaldo sells his image rights to Peter Lim, who is the owner of Mint Media Company and opposing La Liga club Valencia. Hence Cristiano Ronaldo’s Publicity rights were bagged by Mint Media for 6 years.
The EU copyright framework needs to be ameliorated in this regard and the articles 18 sq of the CSDM directive (the so-called “copyright contract law” rules) cannot be the final word on this issue. Towards a modern, more European copyright framework, 9 December 2015, COM(2015) 626 final, nr. sub c Satellite Directive 1993; Art.
January: The year kicked off in Tanzania with the news that the Parliamentary Standing Committee in Tanzania received a report from the Ministry of Culture, Arts and Sports addressing its efforts to review and improve the loopholes found in the Copyright Licensing and Rights to Benefit from Re-Sale Regulations, 2022.
The decision is significant as it is the first by the Fifth Circuit to address the licensing of standards-essential patents and the meaning of “fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (FRAND) licensing terms, adding to the growing body of jurisprudence already issued by the Third, Ninth and Federal Circuits in this area. Background.
in nominal damages for contract and trade secret claims against a former employee, citing the immateriality of defendant’s breach and plaintiff’s failure to prove a fair licensing price for its misappropriation damages. In February 2015, he resigned from his position with AirFacts. In AirFacts, Inc.
Commercial Litigation – A New Court On July 1, 2015, the Arizona Supreme Court introduced a pilot program that provides a new Superior Court venue for commercial litigation cases. The term “business contract or transaction” excludes a “consumer contract or transaction.” By: Sharon Urias, Esq.
The plaintiff applied for an injunction against the defendant for copyright infringement and breach of contract. The photographs were taken at a shoot organised by Orisun TV, owned by Virtual Media Network (“VMN”), who subsequently licensed the photographs to NTA-Star.
446 (2015). 29 (1987), the court noted that it could not reconsider the merits of an award even if the arbitrators made factual or legal errors in interpreting a contract. However, in evaluating whether an award violates public policy, a court is bound by the arbitrators’ interpretation of the underlying contract.
2015 WL 1289984 at 4 (N.D. March 20, 2015). This action may give rise to a number of claims, but it does not support a theory of liability under the CFAA. emphasis mine). Koninklijke Philips N.V. Elec–Tech International Co. , It wasn’t a total loss for Booking, though.
Between 2008-2015, the technology was upscaled to 70 percent of the Burkinabe cotton areal. Just by contracting with AICB, Monsanto could capture the cotton areal. Under the current Bangui Agreement – revised in 2015 without relevant changes – it is possible to patent plants and agricultural produce.
The conference series was created by Dr Gaetano Dimita and the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London in 2015 to bring together creators, legal practitioners and researchers in the field of Interactive Entertainment. The following panel analysed generative AI.
The transfer of IPRs usually takes place via assignment and licensing agreements. To expedite market entry and avoid delays in formalizing an assignment or license agreement, parties sometimes rely on verbal agreements, which are considered valid under Indian Contract Law. Similarly, in Alps South LLC v. Ohio Willow Wood Co.
These videos contained recordings of some of the class lectures he had recorded during his tenure at Pima.Pima contends that Yuksel breached his employment contract by knowingly recording class lectures from 2015 through 2022, even though such recordings were prohibited by the school's policies. Complaint at 5-6).Furthermore,
For instance, the International Trade Commission already requires some disclosure of complainants that seek its exclusive jurisdiction over nationwide injunctions, both as to NPE status and to licensing and industry activity to establish the statutory domestic industry requirement. 2022), available at [link]. [17] 8, 2022). [30]
But then, starting in 2015, Travilyn began to serve copyright termination notices on over 50 of Jay’s most valuable compositions, including “Que Sera, Sera,” which became effective in 2019.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content