article thumbnail

3 Count: Polish Rejection

Plagiarism Today

3: Immersive Experiences and Copyright: TeamLab Sues MODS for ‘Copying their Artwork’ Finally today, Jonny Walfisz at Euronews reports that the Tokyo-based art collective teamLab has filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles-based museum, the Museum of Dream Space (MODS) alleging copyright infringement.

Music 246
article thumbnail

Discerning Signal from Noise: Navigating the Flood of AI-Generated Prior Art

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. The core task of patent examination is identifying quality prior art.

Art 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Humanizing Copyright Infringement: “Who Is the Bad Art Friend?” by Robert Kolker

IPilogue

Perhaps this is what makes “ Who Is the Bad Art Friend? ” Published by the New York Times on October 5 th , 2021, “Who is the Bad Art Friend?” In 2015, Dorland decided to donate one of her kidneys to a stranger. so refreshing. details an ongoing legal dispute between two writers, Dawn Dorland and Sonya Larson.

article thumbnail

Fleetwood Facts: Art Imitates Life, But Does It Infringe Copyright?

Copyright Lately

David Adjmi was previously sued over his Three’s Company parody 3C , but in 2015 the court found the play protected by fair use. But the plaintiffs in the Stereophonic case are suing over what they claim is the copying of real-life events, which makes proving copyright infringement much harder. appeared first on Copyright Lately.

Art 126
article thumbnail

AI and Fair Use: Navigating Legal Challenges in India and the United States

IIPRD

2015) [1] is one of the most cited cases in this context. Another very interesting case, and one in which the ruling should have significant implications for determining the limits of transformative use, is that of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. 2015) [2] Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.

article thumbnail

Rejections Prior to Issuance

Patently-O

patents and asks what percentage received a rejection prior to issuance (blue) and what percentage received a Section 101 rejection prior to issuance (issued patents 2015-2020). The vast majority of these rejections are based upon prior art – and are primarily Section 103 obviousness rejections.

Inventor 139
article thumbnail

UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. No. 2021-1924, (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

This case addresses the legal framework for determining whether prior art anticipates a claimed range. The appropriate legal framework applies a different test depending on whether the prior art discloses a point within the claimed range vs. a range overlapping the claimed range. 2015) (citing Titanium Metals Corp. 3d at 1381.

Art 130