This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. But see The Knit With v. Knitting Fever, Inc., App'x 27 (3d Cir.
This allowed McCormick to advertise what seemed like an attractive lower price and charge more. Thus, for disgorgement of profits, a plaintiff need only show the defendant’s “sales of the allegedly falselyadvertised products,” after which the burden shifts to the defendant to prove “any costs or deductions.” Edriver Inc.,
2015), held as a matter of law that “[b]ecause Amazon’s search results page clearly labels the name and manufacturer of each product offered for sale and even includes photographs of the items, no reasonably prudent consumer accustomed to shopping online would likely be confused as to the source of the products.” Amazon.com, Inc.,
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
From 2015 to 2020, ASHI featured the following slogan on its website below its organizational logo: “American Society of Home Inspectors. They offer memberships to home inspectors, who typically inspect homes prior to home sales; they are currently the only two national bodies of this type. But wasn’t InterNACHI alleging sole competition?
Thanks to its patents, Amgen enjoyed a temporary exclusivity period for pegfilgrastim injections until 2015. But the FDA, independent reviews at scientific journals, and even some of Amgen’s own employees criticized the advertising claims as unsupported and misleading. Sandoz Inc. 2023 WL 4681569 , No. 2:22-cv-05326-RGK-MARx (C.D.
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
Safelite allegedly falselyadvertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” Safelite counterclaimed for trade secret theft not related to advertising.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
These various brands have posted laudatory posts congratulating her for this achievement, while at the same time utilizing her image and Olympic win for their own commercial own use by using it in the form of an advertisement. Building onto this development, in 2015, the Madras High Court in Shivaji Rao Gaikwad v. Entertainment Pvt.
On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for falseadvertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2015: [link]. The court issued a preliminary injunction and the duo agreed to no longer use Vogue’s marks in connection with the album. Metaverse and NFT Filings Decrease. 2020: [link]. 2019: [link].
Plaintiff attempted to plead that a small number of calls to people contracting with it constituted “commercial advertising or promotion,” but the court still didn’t buy it. Vacasa LLC, No. 6:21-cv-326-MC, 2021 WL 5316986 (D. 15, 2021) Previous motion to dismiss. In Grubbs v. Sheakley Grp., 3d 785 (6th Cir.
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh.
2015) “in this circuit, a reverse passing off claim requires the alteration of a product and a subsequent sale.” Falseadvertising: Meishe pointed to statements defendants made in their copyright notice at tiktok.com, in the ByteDance Code of Conduct, in TikTok’s Intellectual Property Policy, and in TikTok’s terms of service.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
But genuine fact issues remained on whether J-B Weld’s advertising of “Made in USA” was false and whether Illinois Tool had standing. So the fact that J-B Weld had low sales in 2015 is not an excuse for delaying, but rather a reason why Illinois Tool should have acted then.
State law bars, among other things, false or misleading representations of fact concerning the reasons for, existence of, or amounts of price reductions and advertising price comparisons without conspicuously identifying the origin of the price the seller is comparing to the current price. 3d 3 (2015). Philip Morris, Inc.,
WPI counterclaimed against Restellini and third-party Institut Restellini SAS – Documentation Centre alleging copyright infringement and falseadvertising. In 2015, the Catalogue Raisonné Amedeo Modigliani is henceforth transferred to Institut Restellini, being taken up with new methods, even more modern and scientifically extensive.
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in falseadvertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. 2015) (cleaned up). 2015) (cleaned up). Superior Court, 9 Cal.5th
A jury found the VSL parties liable for falseadvertising and unjust enrichment, basically for advertising that the formula was still the same, and awarded over $17 million in damages. Now De Simone’s entities compete with Alfasigma. Defendants argued that, under In re GNC Corp., 3d 505 (4th Cir. The district court disagreed.
ICC develops model building codes and standards; it sued a competitor, UpCodes, for falseadvertising (Lanham Act, NY GBL, and common law unfair competition). A plaintiff cannot state a falseadvertising claim based on such a statement because, by definition, it cannot be proven false. UpCodes Inc., 4th - (2d Cir.
But Nestlé pointed to no evidence that plaintiffs knew about the controversy before 2015, creating a genuine dispute about what they knew or should have known. Nestlé then argued that, because this controversy has been in the news since 2003, the plaintiffs have been on “inquiry notice” of their claims for years.
23, 2020) MFSA brought trademark dilution and falseadvertising claims against Netflix for its portrayal in the film “The Laundromat.” Libel/false light claims aren’t addressed in this decision; see below.) Rogers governed the falseadvertising claim. CV 19-9330-CBM-AS(x) (C.D. It’s about money laundering.)
program, but not from its less-competitive EdD program (which was offered online after 2015). USC allegedly orchestrated this scheme through its submission of false/incomplete data, and then advertised the resulting rankings knowing that they were misleading. to 10.5%), and its ranking rose 16 places (from #38 to #22).
26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. So the burden falls to Princeton to show that its exclusion is valid.” Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Ins.
In 2015, the crown mark was registered. Meanwhile, Rex Exchange, founded in 2015, offers an online platform for homeowners and homebuyers to transact the sale of single-family homes. Section 43(a) reaches more broadly; the court here applies Lexmark to both falseadvertising and trademark claims.
January 6, 2015. 271 , Trademark Infringement, Trademark Counterfeiting, and Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, and FalseAdvertising, under 15 U.S.C. §§ 114 and 1125(a). Registration Date. OPTISELECT. May 16, 2017. September 14, 2004. April 29, 2008. April 9, 2019.
According to Plaintiffs, “[a]s of 2015, an estimated 7.3 Abbott Laboratories, No. 22-CV-5435 (RER) (JRC), 2024 WL 2022297 (E.D.N.Y. And indeed, Defendants’ products are a specialty item targeted to a class of informed consumers to aid in their attempts to become pregnant. million women had received some sort of infertility service[.]”
ThermoLife’s website also advertises its “Patented Nitrate Technology.” (DE Between 2015-2019, its website identified 14 patents as “protect[ed]” by the logo, though in 2019 it modified the site to include a table purporting to demonstrate which of ThermoLife’s patents were practiced by ThermoLife’s licensees.
The four images in dispute were posted on defendants Facebook page between August, 2013, and November, 2015. In fact, the purpose of the posts as advertisements for Club Alex indicates that they were meant to be circulated, not hidden, and plaintiffs offer nothing to rebut that inference. Plaintiffs sued in 2021.
In addition, the jury reasonably (if just barely) could have found that Core Health began to manufacture Max Racks after the agreement expired in November 2015.” Payment of the profits on those units reduced Core’s monetary liability, but not the violation. “In But the evidence of this was “relatively insubstantial.”
Neurelis received orphan drug designation from the FDA for its Valtoco for management of ARS in 2015. But Aquestive’s petitioning activity was protected conduct under the anti-SLAPP statute, and Neurelis didn’t show a likelihood of prevailing on the merits on that, including the malicious prosecution claim in its entirety.
In 2015, FDA issued a warning letter to Kind about its “healthy and tasty” claims, stating that the language was an “implied nutrient content claim” and that certain KIND products did not meet the FDA’s saturated fat content requirements necessary to describe food as “healthy.”
In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. 1-800 Contacts. * Another Failed Trademark Suit Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–JIVE v. lululemon sought summary judgment.
CCDH urges brands to not advertise on sites that promote disinformation. X Corp suggests that these efforts have resulted in reduced advertising levels on Twitter. Based on the complaint, a 43(a)(1)(B) falseadvertising cause is a bit of an uphill battle. Are the reports advertisements?
The trial court found Ethicon committed 153,351 violations of the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and 121,844 violations of the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL) and imposed a $1,250 civil penalty for each violation. Materiality can also be relevant to whether class treatment is justified in a private FAL/UCL restitution action.
25, 2024) This interesting lawsuit relies on Targets curatorial reputation for the falseadvertising claim. 2015), rejected the claim that Alabamas statutory ban on class action formation under the ADPTA implicated any substantive right (against deceptive conduct) as a matter of federal law. Target Corp., Allstate Insurance Co.,
Sex toys don’t seem to have been added until 2015. Herman Miller brings claims of unfair competition, false association, falseadvertising, right of publicity, TM rights including dilution, claiming designer’s name, model names, and shape of the design. Porn/adult film, sex therapy, and nudist resorts also missing.
Healthvana sued in May 2020 for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising in violation of both federal and state law, as well for cybersquatting under ACPA. Several hundred thousand bottles of hand sanitizer, however, had already been produced with the older, ‘Healthvana’ label. Telebrands won summary judgment.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content