Remove 2014 Remove Inventor Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Community Property and Patent Ownership

Patently-O

2:21-cv-00126-JRG-RSP) (not available on line for free from what I can see) addressed an accused infringer’s argument that the assignment of the patent-in-suit from the sole inventor (Afana) to the plaintiff, Mobile Equity, was ineffective, and so the patentee lacked standing. Walmart (Case No.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities

IIPRD

Analyzing the convergence of AI and IPR laws, it elucidates the challenges and ambiguities in recognizing AI as inventors or creators. Ai doesn’t understand what it’s doing in the way that a person does but functionally what it is doing is the same thing that an author or an inventor may be doing.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Capturing All the Dimensions: Intellectual Property Protection for 3-D Designs and 3-D Printing Methods

More Than Your Mark

However, if your 3-D printed work relies on the files created by another, or is the result of scanning the sculpture of another, you may have to make proper attribution of ownership to the file owner. An example of this is a 2014 initiative by Hasbro, Inc. , the toy company that owns the My Little Pony intellectual property.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Continues to Apply Strict Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Analysis

Patently-O

In particular, we know that the first-inventor-to-file provision found in 102(a)(2) spells out, as the name suggests, that a prior-filed patent application (once it becomes public) will serve as prior art against a later filed patent application. Ordinarily, obviousness analysis compares a claim against prior disclosures.

Patent 53
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Julys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

However, in a tale of legislative fortune, India’s Bayh Dole Bill was withdrawn in 2014. In this context, Swaraj and Anupriya also discussed the issue of IP Ownership in Publicly Funded Research in 2021 highlighting various departmental policies and guidelines governing public-funded R&D and the issues therein.

article thumbnail

“What’s Mine Is Not Yours To Give Me”—Nor To Take Without Just Compensation: A New Jersey’s Reaction To Sovereign Immunity, Intellectual Property, & Takings

LexBlog IP

26 , rejected the claim that taking away, or ignoring, the ability-to-control indicia of ownership amounts to a taking: Similarly, property rights, including copyright, have been described as ownership of a bundle of rights or interests. 34,] 51-61[(2014) ]. See Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. Nation Enters., 2218, 85 L.Ed.2d

article thumbnail

Attorneys Adam Shartzer and Josh Carrigan Author Law360 Expert Analysis “Patent Fee-Shifting Often Leaves Prevailing Parties Unpaid”

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Supreme Court’s 2014 Octane Fitness LLC v. Starting in 2014, several states implemented new laws that would impose a bonding requirement in certain situations. Indeed, the Max Sound saga discussed above is a prime example of the muddy waters that surround patent ownership and financial interests. Since the U.S. ”).

Patent 52