Remove 2014 Remove Copying Remove Fair Use
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa By a 7-2 vote, the U.S. Goldsmith , No. 569 (1994).

article thumbnail

Plagiarism Police come for Winston & Strawn

Patently-O

2024) A recent copyright infringement lawsuit filed by small Boston intellectual property boutique Hsuanyeh Law Group PC (HLG) against international giant Winston & Strawn LLP focuses a dividing line that can highlight when copying the work of another firm is permissible. Winston & Strawn , 23-cv-11193 (S.D.N.Y.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Amicus in Apple v. Corellium

43(B)log

Summary of argument: The constitutional goal of copyright protection is to “promote the progress of science and useful arts,” Art. It is that functionality, and not the copying, to which Apple truly objects. But fair use protects precisely this kind of analysis. Patton, 769 F.3d 3d 1232, 1256 (11th Cir.

article thumbnail

Twitter Suspends Copyright Holder as Musk Outlaws ‘Weaponization’ of DMCA

TorrentFreak

Since most tweets relating to the initial dispute have since been deleted or disabled, here we rely on archived and cached copies for evidence. Copies of these communications have not been made public, so their nature remains unknown. “I was hit by DMCA tens of times since 2014 and I was suspended once for 3 weeks.

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police Infringement–Sunny Factory v. Chen

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Plus, the court says Fuxi had a legitimate motivation to send takedown notices because “Copyright holders have an obligation to police the field where their marks may be used and to give notice to potential infringers in order to preserve their rights.” New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By Fair Use–Hosseinzadeh v.

Copyright 134
article thumbnail

The 5 Worst Copyright Decisions of 2021

Copyright Lately

Relying on the server test , Sinclair unsuccessfully argued that it and its affiliates didn’t infringe the copyright in Nicklen’s video because they only embedded it on their websites from Instagram or Facebook, as opposed to maintaining a copy of the video on a Sinclair-controlled server. Wilmott Storage Services.

Copyright 113
article thumbnail

Parliamentary Standing Committee and Copyright Reform: One Step Forward, Three Steps Back

SpicyIP

Limitations on storage of copied works in digital formats. To put things in perspective, even the most IP-friendly jurisdiction of US in Cambridge v. Becker has held 10% copying to be fair use in most cases, on top of the flexible ‘ Amount & substantiality ’ factor test in its fair use doctrine.

Copyright 119