This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Originally posted on June 18, 2014. The post Best of 2014: Redskins decision: The present judges the past appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. I’ve been writing about the dispute over the REDSKINS trademark on this blog more or less since the beginning of the blog itself.
First posted on March 12, 2014. Michel — The post Best of 2014: Consensus in Cleveland appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. Far be it from me to compare myself to the distinguished former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit, the Hon.
It continues on remand in Arizona federal court, where this case first began a decade ago in 2014. The High Court ruled that VIP had no defense to either cause of action. But the story does not end there.
The move echoes Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s 2014 declaration that “all our patent … belong to you” – a pledge that garnered significant attention but left many questions unanswered.
Originally posted 2014-11-17 17:55:38. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe NFL is a lot of things, but I never thought it was stupid. It turns out that it isn’t.
Sheeran affirming the Southern District of New York’s dismissal of copyright infringement claims filed against British singer-songwriter Ed Sheeran over his 2014 single “Thinking Out Loud.” Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a ruling in Structured Asset Sales, LLC v.
Originally posted 2014-02-26 09:43:40. Republished by Blog Post PromoterWe reported on Lego’s overreaching years ago here and here. They tried to use trademark rights as a way to protect the design of their toy and avoid competition. But that is not what trademarks are, much less what they are for.
Image by macrovector on Freepik The National Biodiversity Authority has invited comments to revise the Guidelines on Access to Biological Resources and Associated Knowledge and Benefits Sharing Regulations, 2014 better known as the ABS Guidelines, 2014.
Rick Beato has a great analysis of the two songs: [link] The underlying dispute centers on allegations that Sheeran's Grammy-winning "Thinking Out Loud" (2014) infringes the copyright of Marvin Gaye and Ed Townsend's "Let's Get It On" (1973). Structured Asset Sales, LLC v.
Originally posted 2014-01-22 13:44:33. Republished by Blog Post Promoter A week or so ago it was the sad story of Jimi Hendrix on the bottle. The […] The post Drink to me only with thine eyes appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION.
The “Infringing Website List” (IWL) was launched in March 2014 as part of the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit’s (PIPCU) efforts to combat intellectual property crime. Without reference to domain extensions, the numbering system indicates that soccer365 was the 16th domain to be added to the IWL back in February 2014.
The law3suit was filed by a producer named Arty that claimed Happier was an infringement of his 2014 remix of OneRepublic’s I Lived. In 2014 Hansmeier as sentenced to 14 years in prison. However, he has continued appealing while in prison and, most surprisingly, renewed his honeypot campaign while behind bars.
1 Hit ‘Made for You’ Finally today, Sterling Whitaker at Taste of Country reports that country music performer Jake Owen is facing a lawsuit from songwriters Alexander Cardinale and Morgan Reid, who allege that Owen’s 2020 hit Made for You is an infringement of their 2014 song of the same name.
For the chart below, I tabulated about 7,000 individual votes from the Federal Circuit Judges in patent cases decided 2014-2021. That is why the data here is limited to 2014+. by Dennis Crouch. For each judge, I show the percentage of individual decisions that sided with the patent challenger; or patent owner in each case.
Finally today, Augusta Victoria Saraiva at Bloomberg reports that Taylor Swift has re-released her 2014 hit single Wildest Dreams as part of an ongoing attempt to regain control of her back catalog of music. 3: Taylor Swift Rerecords ‘Wildest Dreams’ in Fresh Copyright Salvo.
This prompted Andre Sims, who wrote the song in 2014, to file a lawsuit against H.E.R., Camper, the coauthor of Focus, went on Instagram live and said that Endless Minds was the inspiration for the melody of the song. Camper and others involved in the song. Sims initially sought $3 million in the case, as well as injunctive relief.
A record studio owned by Melomega released a version of the song in 2014. The lawsuit was filed by the music company Melomega, which claims that 10,000 Hours is an infringement of the 1973 R&B song The First Time Baby Is A Holiday. Neither Dan + Shay or Justin Bieber had any comment on the lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed by screenwriter Joe Carlini, who claimed that the film was an infringement of his 2014 script entitled What the F is He Thinking. Finally today, Anousha Sakoui at the Los Angeles Times reports that the United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case filed against Paramount Pictures over the film What Men Want.
The lawsuit was filed in 2014 by musician Marcus, Gray, who claimed Dark Horse was an infringement of his earlier song, Joyful Noise. Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Katy Perry Wins in Dark Horse Copyright Appeal. Originally, a jury sided with Gray and awarded him $2.8 million in damages.
Specifically, Cox alleges the metadata on the evidence indicates that they are files from 2016 though the case only deals with 2012-2014. However, Cox is appealing that ruling to the Fourth Circuit and is claiming that the labels either withheld or manipulated the evidence against them.
In 2014, the estate attempted to file a notice of copyright termination with Authentic Brands to terminate a 1983 agreement that resulted in them obtaining rights to the song.
The app was launched in 2014 though the original developers abandoned it quickly after its debut. First off today, Priya Anand at Bloomberg reports that the piracy app Popcorn Time has shuttered its doors, ending a seven-year run where the app was one of the most prominent and popular piracy services.
First off today, Reuters reports that a lawsuit accusing Taylor Swift of copyright infringement in her 2014 hit single Shake it Off has been allowed to move ahead, setting the stage for a possible trial. Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Can’t Shake This: Taylor Swift to Face Copyright Lawsuit.
Next up today, Curtis Killman at Tulsa World reports that members of a group known as The GAP Band have filed a lawsuit against those involved in the 2014 song Uptown Funk by Bruno Mars and Mark Ronson. 2: Lawsuit Claims Bruno Mars’ Song Violated The GAP Band’s Copyright.
One notable example is Ted Ligety, an alpine skier who earned gold medals in both the 2006 Turin Olympics and the 2014 Sochi Olympics. Olympians are typically celebrated for their physical achievements—but some are also inventors who have contributed to innovation in the sporting world. By: Foley & Lardner LLP
In my last post, I focused on the hypothetical fair use defense of generative AI under the principles articulated in the Google Books decision of 2014.
Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice Corp. As an update to my posts from 2017, 2019, 2020, and March 2021, it has now been 86 months since the U.S. CLS Bank decision.
However, that court has bounced it back, citing a 2014 ruling that held open-source licenses had an “extra element” that needed to be heard in state court. A California Court sided with Vizio, sending the dispute to a federal district court. 2: Kenya’s Sauti Sol Threatens to Sue Raila Odinga Over Copyright.
Okolita began making costumes in 2014 for her own children and turned that into a business the following year. In 2020 she claims to have sold over 8,000 pieces, mostly through her Etsy store. However, since then, she claims that the retail giants have been using her images and descriptions to sell similar costumes and hurt her business.
The lawsuit was filed in 2017 by songwriters Sean Hall and Nathan Butler, who claimed that their 2001 song Playas Gon’ Play was infringed by Swift’s 2014 song Shake it Off. Specifically, they cited lyrical and other similarities.
Originally posted 2014-07-24 15:34:57. Republished by Blog Post PromoterBad feelings from (not so?) long ago get played out across the China Straits. Just how much should trademark registration reflect personal, national, or ethnic sensibilities? This question continues to linger. But not in China.
2 of A Corua has now determined the amount of compensation to be paid to Mediapro, for infringement carried out a decade ago during the 2014/2015 football season. Spain’s Supreme Court ruled that Puerto 80 Projects SL, and company owner/Rojadirecta operator Igor Seoane, could be held jointly liable. Commercial Court No.
Originally posted 2014-08-04 15:23:44. Republished by Blog Post PromoterJudges — especially in the Eastern District of New York — are picking up what’s going on in the “elite salons” end of the trademarks-as-distribution-method-enforcement scam. Ever hear of Quality King?
Originally posted 2014-08-07 16:31:50. Republished by Blog Post PromoterCan a company name be “prejudicial”? My friend Rob Holmes — he of the purportedly prejudicially-monikered “IPCybercrime” firm — is, quite reasonably, going to finish his coffee rather than worry about that too much. (As
Blockchain technology was separated from currency in 2014, and that advance opened the door for using blockchain for applications beyond currency. The engine that runs the bitcoin ledger that Nakamoto designed is called the blockchain; the original and largest blockchain is the one that still orchestrates bitcoin transactions today.
Originally posted 2014-05-05 09:15:46. Republished by Blog Post Promoter And the metaphors mix, as you’ll see, but what better on a Halloween night where half the lights in the neighborhood are out for real?
Denmark, a country with an overall movie and TV show piracy rate of 11% in 2014, now has an overall rate of 20%, up from the 13% reported in Mediavision’s survey in 2022. With an overall rate of just 8% in 2014, increases over the years led to a 13% overall rate for Finland in 2022.
The eatery owners argued that they had been using the name Burger King since 1992, which was over two decades before Burger King US entered the Indian market in 2014. In the instant case, the Pune eaterys use of Burger King predates both, Burger King USs use (2014) and registration (2006) of such mark in India.
In 2014, Alifax, a company that specialized in producing clinical instruments, filed a lawsuit against Alcor Scientific (“Alcor”), which operated in the same general area of clinical development, alleging trade secret misappropriation under the Rhode Island Uniform Trade Secrets Act (RIUTSA).
And its reach is significant: The company, which launched to the public in February 2014, now reportedly has more than 20 million active daily users. Slack, a collaboration tool for workplaces, has been among the forces upending the established communication order, offering an organized alternative to email. By: Array
In 2014, Medina sued Microsoft. In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. The court says that the 2020 ruling didn’t require publishers to depublish the extant versions of the 2014 documents, so this argument had a faulty premise. This case brought to mind the Martin v. Hearst case.
I’ve lost count as to how many times the Court has refused to provide clarity to the fundamental question of patent eligibility since it last muddied the waters in Alice back in 2014. I stopped counting several years ago, when the number of petitions—pleas begging for help really—crossed over 50.
After a nine-year saga, beginning when Amgen sued Sanofi for allegedly infringing two of its patents in 2014, the Supreme Court held that Amgen’s asserted patents failed to satisfy the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. § On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc.
During the Cox trial, the music companies presented a hard drive that contained the files, suggesting that those were the original songs that were pirated between 2012 and 2014. The allegedly infringing files were central to prove direct copyright infringement. Vacate the $1 Billion Verdict.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content