This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Introduction Registration of a trademark is an important step toward building a brand on solid ground. Lack of distinctiveness to incorrect classification are among the common errors that can bring derailment upon your trademark registration.
First published February 14, 2013. The post Best of 2013: WAL-ZYR versus ZYRTEC: Allergic to legislating trademark law? I have no problem using the TTABlog for a blog launching point every week. Why would I when I can riff on a post such. appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
Originally posted 2013-09-28 21:24:28. Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnother not-safe-for-work story is out there about a trademark registration denied under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act as “immoral or scandalous.” ” John Welch and Marc Randazza address the issue brilliantly here and here.
As seen in the Benny Goodman case in the TTAB, celebrity, brand power and trademark rights may outlive a celebrity’s peak performing years, but will bear fruit only as long as the roots. The post Best of 2013: Arnold Palmer and the Perfect Brand appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
This was originally posted on September 9, 2013. The big story today, as One World Trade Center nears completion, is about “rights” The post Best of 2013: WORLD TRADE CENTER naming rights and municipal IP policy – What rights? “Best of” posts will continue until next week.
Originally posted 2013-03-29 13:18:08. Trademark, no. Republished by Blog Post PromoterDespite the impression you might get around here, being a big company doesn’t mean you have to always be wrong — or even always be the pursuer — in an IP dispute. appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION.
First published May 19, 2013. which stands for International Trademark Association! The post Best of 2013: It’s fun to stay at the U-N-T-A! Last year there was much Strum und Drang here about INTA — sorry, I mean The I-N-T-A!, now there’s. appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
Despite the high economic relevance of innovation and explosive invention growth reflected in the number of patents issued annually by the United States Patent and Trademark Continue reading.
Top Trademark Trends of 2021. 2021 was a busy year in the world of trademarks. The uncertainties of COVID in a second year couldn’t stop huge application filing numbers and many developments in the world of trademarks. Trademark scams continued to proliferate, despite some increased efforts to crack down.
First published on June 27, 2013. The post Best of 2013: Lanham Act attorneys’ fees: Good to know appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. The situation with attorneys’ fees in “exceptional cases” under the Lanham Act is, to put it mildly, not clear. I’ve written about it.
The year saw many trademark stories in the news as backlogs continued at the USPTO even while application filing numbers dropped from their all time highs during the two previous years. Here are the biggest trademark stories of 2022 that we have been following at EMP&A. Celebrity trademark messes. Queen of Christmas.
And trademarks have been along for the ride. While there were not, in my opinion, any major court developments affecting trademark owners, there have been many other events and changes that have impacted the world of trademarks over the past 12 months. The year’s biggest story impacted trademarks in a few different ways.
NBC claims that JKMG is practicing trademark squatting to unfairly make money by registering trademarks belonging to others. What is trademark squatting? WIPO defines trademark squatting as the act of a person registering a trademark for a brand that belongs to someone else. JKMG’s trademark portfolio.
A few weeks ago, the USPTO published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to adjust fees for trademark filings. According to a 2013 report from WIPO, small and medium-sized enterprises rely on trademarks much more than patents. Just a few quarters ago, the USPTO touted that the trademark division had a growing surplus.
INTRODUCTION A trademark can be registered for the purpose of securing diverse graphic and non-graphic unique symbols and indicia to distinguish the products or services of a trader from that of others. This article discusses the domain of trademark registration, which is useful for businesses and individuals in order to protect their brand.
On October 5, HBC filed a statement of claim at the Federal Court of Canada against a Quebec family for trademark infringement, depreciation of goodwill, and passing off. The Zellers Trademark: Then and Now. In 2013, the chain of Zellers stores officially closed. HBC’s Claim of Trademark Infringement. is contravening s.
Prabha Sridevan, Judge, MHC (2000-2010) and Chairperson, IPAB (2011-2013) was recently interviewed by SpicyIP Doctoral Fellow Malobika Sen as part of her doctoral research. the original plaintiff) filed a suit to protect four registered Kirloskar trademarks against alleged infringers. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd.
INTRODUCTION Section 29 [1] of the Trademark Act, 1999 , defines infringement as: “Trademarks infringement occurs if an unauthorized party makes use of a registered trademark in a way that is likely to lead to confusion about the origin of the product.” FAMOUS CASES OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 1.Foreign
In October of 2013 I blogged here about my participation in a panel on “trademark misuse” at the annual meeting of the AIPLA, where, The post Best of 2014: Nothing but err appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. Originally published on February 21, 2014.
We are pleased to bring you a guest post from Payal Saraogi, on a recent decision of the Delhi High Court on Google’s use of trademarks as advertisement keywords. Revival of the Third-party Trademark as a Keyword Dispute. Google India Private Limited and others. The parties and their positions.
On October 30, 2013, a German company applied to the German Trade Mark Office (DPMA) for a word mark “Black Friday”. On December 20, 2013, the trade mark was registered for a large number of goods and services in classes 9, 35 and 41. The trademark was remained valid in Classes 9 and 41, and in part of Class 35.
Andrusiek's "actual" trademark use on comic books did not begin until 2017, but from 2006 he used the term as the name of a character, which the Board accepted as use analogous to trademark use, leading to the award of priority to Andrusiek. 108 USPQ2d 1134, 1145 (TTAB 2013). Andrusiek v. Cosmic Crusaders LLC and Lewis J.
While burgers in the trademark case Burger King Co. Although the Pune commercial court held that Burger King US miserably failed to prove that the local eatery had committed trademark infringement, the Bombay High Court stayed this order and restrained the latter from using the trademark Burger King. Who doesnt love burgers?
Originally posted 2013-10-08 13:01:57. Republished by Blog Post PromoterAmerica’s greatest natural Trademark Trial and Appeal Board resource, John Welch, has posted part one of his Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011.
PepsiCo had registered the tagline “For the Bold” as a trademark in 2013 for its Doritos tortilla chips and used it extensively for promotions when it was launched in India in 2015. it filed for a trademark infringement and unfair advantage suit in the court against Parle Agro. For the Bold!”, For the Bold!” Antox India (P) Ltd.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), who has an important executive role with political accountability and therefore, by statute, must be Presidentially-Appointed and Senate-Confirmed (PAS). This rule applies equally to the Director of the U.S.
If the title sounds familiar, you are part of the reason Booking.com successfully trademarked “Booking.com” while paving the way for owners of similar marks to receive trademark protection. The Decision. Justice Breyer disagreed with the majority’s decision, specifically (1) that placing “.com”
2021) In 2013, Nike, Inc. Converse") brought a trademark infringement action under the Lanham Act against hundreds of participants in Chinese counterfeiting networks. Legal developments - 1. Next Investments, LLC v. Bank of China, No. 20-602 (2d Cir. Nike") and Converse Inc.
A recent ruling by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court elevated the brand Haldiram as a well-known trademark. This is a landmark decision in the Indian intellectual property law regime as it sets a precedent for safeguarding established trademarks in India. 2024 for further understanding of the concept of well-known trademarks.
This is a trademark case. Dollar Financial holds registered trademarks for MONEY MART – the name it uses for its payday and title loan venders as well as pawn shops and pawn brokerages. Brittex Financial v. Dollar Financial ( Fed. The USPTO then granted the registrations associated with the new uses.
What happens when a junior trademark holder’s business becomes so popular and well known that it threatens to swamp the reputation of a senior mark holder? The senior mark holder brings a trademark infringement case alleging “reverse confusion” among its potential customers. After some discovery, Dropbox moved for summary judgment.
“Defcad stands against artificial scarcity, intellectual property, copyright, patentable objects, and regulation in all its forms.” – Cody Wilson, Promo Video, 2013 – In 2012, when this blog was new, I wrote a short piece about Cody Wilson’s vision to combine Second Amendment maximalism with tech-utopianism to ensure that every citizen has even easier (..)
The Single Judge Bench (SB) consisting of Justice Sanjeev Narula made some intriguing observations regarding the trademarkability of the mark “Aashiqui” as a movie franchise and restraining its use by other entities. Murugadoss (2013) concerning the title “Raja Rani” and by the Bombay HC in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd v.
Under European Union (EU) law—specifically, Article 103(2) of Regulation 1308/2013—signs that qualify as protected designations of origin (PDOs) or protected geographical indications (PGIs) are shielded against any direct or indirect commercial use, as well as against any “evocation” of it that is likely to mislead a consumer as to the true origin (..)
Andrusiek's "actual" trademark use on comic books did not begin until 2017, but from 2006 he used the term as the name of a character, which the Board accepted as use analogous to trademark use, leading to the award of priority to Andrusiek. 108 USPQ2d 1134, 1145 (TTAB 2013). Andrusiek v. Cosmic Crusaders LLC and Lewis J.
Originally posted 2013-01-08 13:57:37. Republished by Blog Post PromoterPresident Obama is suffering from the right-of-publicity blues again. And now maybe we understand why he wants an intellectual property anti-counterfeiting lawyer on the Supreme Court — this could rise to the level of an international incident already, Jack!
The following are the comments our firm submitted today regarding the USPTO’s proposed trademark fee changes and increases: Docket No.: Pelton & Associates, PLLC Regarding “Setting and Adjusting Trademark Fees During Fiscal Year 2025” The following are the comments of Erik M. trademark registrations.
Today, it’s about the trademark arena. The court declined to form an opinion on Apple’s contention that over the past 15 years, it had established a family of i-prefix trademarks, which would assist a consumer in better recognising its products. (c)
To be registrable, a proposed trademark must function as a source indicator in the eyes of relevant consumers. Hungerford Smith” to identify the source of its soft drink syrup; the proposed mark "Burgundy"appeared only as a flavor designation and not as a trademark. Is DRINK MORE BEER too common a phrase to serve as a trademark?
In addition, collective trademarks identify goods or services of members of their association with respect to third parties. Furthermore, on March 12, 2013, the Morcilla de Burgos Manufacturers’ Association filed an application for the following Spanish collective trademark no. However, can the two coexist?
The case revolved around SAP Se (Appellant) trying to furnish new evidence according to the Trademark Rules, 2002. It started trading in India in around 1992 under the mark “SAP” and applied for trademark registration in 1999. The Appellant herein was a software entity providing business solutions for a number of industries.
A major contribution of economics to our understanding of trademarks is "search costs", generally here. This idea is that trademarks are an efficient tool for consumers because a consumer can rely on the mark, rather than having to search for sufficient information about the source of the product each time he wishes to make a purchase.
The turbulent behavior is in relation to their intentions to trademark the words “Candy” and “Saga.” Since then, however, it appears that King Digital has backtracked on their original intentions slightly, and has removed their application to trademark the word “Candy.” This does not affect our E.U.
It is pertinent to note that these keywords can either be generic terms like “red bag” or trademarks such as “Louis Vuitton” and the issue arises when the latter is bid for. The law surrounding third parties bidding on trademarks has been settled by way of many injunctions as seen in Make My Trip (India) Private Limited v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content