article thumbnail

MicroSurgical Decision Reiterates PTAB’s ‘Wide Net’ Approach to Transition Applications Under the AIA

IP Watchdog

March 16, 2013 marked a watershed date in the practice of patent law as the effective date of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). Not surprisingly, there were a number of patent applications filed that bridged the March 16, 2013 AIA effective date.

Invention 124
article thumbnail

First-to-File: A Game-Changer in US Patent Law

JD Supra Law

The United States patent system underwent a significant change with the enactment of the First-Inventor-to-File (FITF) provision of the America Invents Act, which became effective on March 16, 2013. The FITF provision transitioned the United States from a First-to-Invent system to a First-Inventor-to-File system.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

DHC and 3(k): This time using the ‘Technical effect’ Test

SpicyIP

In this post, apart from discussing the background and arguments raised in the case, I will discuss how the court, relying upon the now scrapped draft 2013 guidelines , applied the technical effect test to decide the patentability of the invention. demonstrate technical effect. demonstrate technical effect.

Invention 110
article thumbnail

Agricultural Machinery Manufacturing Company (Par-Kan) Sued for Alleged Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. The Plaintiff claims that Par-Kan had knowledge of the ‘940 and ‘123 patents because these patents are continuations of U.S. Kalida, Ohio – The Plaintiff, UNVERFERTH MFG.

article thumbnail

Online Course for Patent Agent Exam Preparation [February 5]

SpicyIP

As part of the course pedagogy, two question papers from 2013 and 2016 will be solved and methods to draft claims, specification, and abstract will be discussed. Participants can also send in their solved questions from the years 2013 and 2016 and they will get individual feedback.

article thumbnail

Most Cited Supreme Court Patent Cases Since 1952

Patently-O

Lots of the new learning in patent law over the past decade has focused on patent eligibility. 826 (2002) (arising under jurisdiction – patent assertions in counterclaims, overruled by AIA); Gunn v. 251 (2013) (arising under jurisdiction for patent attorney malpractice); Warner-Jenkinson Co.,

Patent 111
article thumbnail

Despite 3D-Visision, Appellant Filed in the Wrong Court

Patently-O

On appeal now, the Federal Circuit has refused to hear the case — finding that a patent ownership dispute does not “arise under” the patent laws. 251 (2013) (patent attorney malpractice does not arise under the patent laws). See, Gunn v. Minton , 568 U.S.