article thumbnail

The skinny on fair use

Likelihood of Confusion

Originally posted 2013-08-05 13:37:42. Walter Olson rounds it up: Ralph Lauren lawyers: dont you dare reproduce our skinny-model photo in the course of criticizing our use of skinny models [BoingBoing] With photoshop, evidently, quite a bit! Republished by Blog Post PromoterHow much dumb can possibly be fit into a size two?

article thumbnail

Fair Use Week: A Salute (of sorts) to Lenz v. UMG

The Illusion of More

Fair Use Week. But in 2013, some anti-copyright ideologues thought it should be a thing, so now it’s a thing. […]. The post Fair Use Week: A Salute (of sorts) to Lenz v. Well, here we are again. Ninth annual.

Fair Use 114
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Is Generative AI Fair Use of Copyright Works? NYT v. OpenAI

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Such uses, they argue, constitute copyright infringement. Fair Use Precedent? Google Books and Transformative Use The past two decades have seen a wealth of technological developments, but generative AI is qualitatively different from everything that has come before. But he eventually reversed his own position.

Fair Use 138
article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex:Product disparagement or nominative fair use?

IP and Legal Filings

Nominative fair use of a trademark is a legal doctrine that can be used as a defence in some types of trademark infringement cases. Following are the measures to be taken care of while taking nominative fair use as a defence – The use of the registered trade mark was bonfide. No sponsorship or endorsement.

article thumbnail

Fair Use for Documentaries in US Copyright Law: Brown v Netflix

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).

Fair Use 105
article thumbnail

Let’s Go Hazy: Making Sense of Fair Use After Warhol

Copyright Lately

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fair use opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. Andy Warhol Foundation v.

article thumbnail

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

LexBlog IP

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] 9] In reaching that determination, the court relied chiefly on the Second Circuit’s 2013 decision in Cariou v.