2013 Artistic Work Copying 
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 12, 2022
This IP protection ensures that other designers, whether direct competitors or producers of knock-off jewelry or imitation jewelry, do not ruin their reputation or copy their designs so as to reduce the value of their jewelry and lose out on potential sales. Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act defines what “artistic work” is.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 30, 2023
in Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin and has since combined his love for photographic art and computer science by building an online system to help protect artists’ works on the internet. He received his B.S. They tout to be a family owned local car business always looking to give the best deal. Gotsch, Sr.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
MAY 3, 2023
Originality is the quality that distinguishes produced or invented works from copies, clones, forgeries, or derivative works by being new or novel. The word “originality” is frequently used in conjunction with the creativity of writers, thinkers, and artists. It was written with a distinct style and message.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
9] In reaching that determination, the court relied chiefly on the Second Circuit’s 2013 decision in Cariou v. Prince [10] (no relation), in which the Second Circuit rejected the premise that a secondary work must comment on the original to be sufficiently “transformative” to qualify as fair use. 3d 312, 316 (S.D.N.Y. 29] Prince.
Selvam & Selvam Blog
APRIL 1, 2022
The mark “Respule” owned by Cipla Ltd has been in use since 2013 and Cipla had been selling medicines that treat respiratory ailments under the names Budecort Respules and Duolin Respules. In the instant case, Cipla Ltd filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against Sun Pharma for infringing the trademark “Respule”.
IP and Legal Filings
AUGUST 14, 2023
Person A makes a copy of the movie on his phone and shares it with his friends. Going back to the same example again, the first point of infringement would be where A illegally copied the film. In this scenario, when infringement has become borderless, should the rule of lex loci protectionis be blanketly applied to all the cases?
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
Case C‑826/21 The UPFR is a collective management organisation handling the related rights of phonogram producers.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content